Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Wed, 30 November 2022 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA49C1522BC for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:13:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RNEJz_9Hxc-U for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC00CC1522C0 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:13:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfednr03.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.67]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr24.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4NMkky6jNWz2019; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:12:58 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1669824778; bh=7XjJ83CwnUfIR0IQeAsY/nv+a2tATfgMgIglaA51+lE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=upXpdtviQOy87x7tn3Qt1RTScArM/13CGBuSPf1PhkNb1MxfZdrGIryRfrHxbBgWz n0ohpHU0lj06039UQglf9GP5YHJ/14ytl1q/Xj0eqG4vdZpv9Oa51saPXI5896/FiG YitTlZlZZa+/ea9BUwNPVsBg0w4P0mIcO+WjazPQrLk7QThLAwzw1HmEELPx85M8F9 USzzZuyeh413OwKTTiBmkZe3olSdNZXV2MH+4n1UTWQ+NCrqwIxqiL0Jw73Wnj5y/l lEWGOTdRnd3Zxw5PsXw/NDWcUHOCm+PeLKDkrkTylRVdzL8grOo6oMhnYF8QCXFoht C8fODX45mLmQQ==
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: 🔔 WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
Thread-Index: AQHZBMKLFvIs7cCyEka0YvWxi86HIa5XmjvQ
Content-Class:
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:12:58 +0000
Message-ID: <15025_1669824778_6387810A_15025_394_1_cc305df2ba73479facecad84ad91dcc6@orange.com>
References: <BN9PR11MB537174D17B1613C8F98EC08AB8159@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB537174D17B1613C8F98EC08AB8159@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SetDate=2022-11-30T15:39:10Z; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Method=Privileged; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Name=unrestricted_parent.2; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ActionId=1d360cb6-f14b-4e91-a190-197409093723; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ContentBits=0
x-originating-ip: [10.115.26.50]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_cc305df2ba73479facecad84ad91dcc6orangecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/reDD6_7BHFL3RzcxKPQgwNyEQoY>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:13:05 -0000

Hi all,

This version addresses all the comments raised in my previous review of the document. I have only very few comments:


  *   Section “5.9.  srhActiveSegmentIPv6Type”: please add the pointer to the IANA registry under “Additional Information”.
  *   Section 6.3:
     *   Is there any SPRING document that explains the motivation for having more than one SRH?
     *   Please reword these two sentences:

   OLD:

   [RFC8200] describes the support of multiple extension headers in one

   IPv6 packet.  Allowing the use of multiple SRH per SRv6 packet.


     *   I’m afraid the SHOULD normative language for the ordering is not required as it is redundant (?) with this part from RFC7011:

   If an Information Element is required more than once in a Template,
   the different occurrences of this Information Element SHOULD follow
   the logical order of their treatments by the Metering Process.


     *   What is an “active SRH”?

I support advancing this spec assuming these comments are addressed. Thanks.

Cheers,
Med

De : OPSAWG <opsawg-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Envoyé : mercredi 30 novembre 2022 14:54
À : opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hello, WG.  As discussed at IETF 115, we want to conduct a WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh.  The authors believe this work is stable and moreover used the 115 hackathon to develop a interoperable implementations (linked in Data Tracker) .  Additionally, IANA has already weighed in on this work and agree with the considerations approach.

Therefore, we are calling for a two week LC.  We will conclude on December 14.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/

Please review the current -04 draft, post your comments and/or your thoughts on the current text.

Thanks.

Joe

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.