Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-08.txt

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 20 March 2018 10:05 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA481242F7 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zQTyk_Xkh8AV for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40501200F1 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-8654.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8654.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.134.84]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 471C5DD0; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:05:54 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <DABB1B8E-0DD7-4D1C-84F7-16FADF730695@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:05:52 +0000
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6BBF4191-C4FD-4B43-90B1-2D3103507FC6@deployingradius.com>
References: <151905481837.18617.15913982011400739178@ietfa.amsl.com> <075DDE66-95C9-46B4-A47A-E313C39164D3@deployingradius.com> <CAB4uO_yk5f3He+hJkAoxNSD+LaZndfuGWvM1Es_wkY_XTB+bHg@mail.gmail.com> <DABB1B8E-0DD7-4D1C-84F7-16FADF730695@cisco.com>
To: "Douglas Gash (dcmgash)" <dcmgash@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/rum4_saxBUYsbvXAtMSnQ0t73bU>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-08.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:05:57 -0000

> On Mar 19, 2018, at 3:37 PM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <dcmgash@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Apologies for delay Alan, I have goofed with mail forwarding.
>  
> We still have some work to do on the security section. I will check to see which items we missed outside the security section, as I thought we had them all covered.

  The point is to *engage* with the working group.  Simply throwing a new draft "over the wall" periodically does not inspire confidence.

  On top of that, the Security Considerations still contains substantial amounts of my text, verbatim.  With no acknowledgement that this is the case.

  It would be good for the authors to engage with the WG to demonstrate that the document is ready.  The document has been shown repeatedly to be not ready for publication, with minimal engagement, feedback, or updates.

  Alan DeKok.