Re: [OPSAWG] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06

heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Tue, 17 April 2018 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C478C124319; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KYTwI_OxkMcG; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7716C1200FC; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id 0887D3A6DC; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:49:00 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:49:00 +0000
From: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180417154859.GA59765@shrubbery.net>
References: <152363066886.26321.3212300538180273898@ietfa.amsl.com> <HKXPR0601MB1799868866AF89F9699EAF28FCB10@HKXPR0601MB1799.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> <20180415160956.GC66082@shrubbery.net> <ace47a71-0e9d-6a0d-ae37-1f4bc48ada0b@stevecrocker.com> <20180416232930.GB47095@shrubbery.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180416232930.GB47095@shrubbery.net>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/s1QXY_fZPva8Kjf-9s0MWAETVAw>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:49:03 -0000

Why is there IPR on this draft?  Is this because of section 3?  A section
that is unnecessary and could be entirely removed without affecting the
draft in any manner?

Otherwise, I think it absolutely absurd that there is IPR on this document.