Re: [OPSAWG] 回复: RE: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06

Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com> Thu, 19 April 2018 12:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ibagdona@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC71A12D956; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.988
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ozYvfIU606ki; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com (mail-wr0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 431C31271FD; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id u4-v6so13407423wrg.10; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=bRM/B97TLVF6hLgZsriYieyCn1GwDI8hEh7ATDwFdLQ=; b=N02Zi9o8LALP6HI8605I3PNUEDr6LCBcMvjakbvaYfA9iAxJz/ucHw+awcd5igIyxf 4PPxIOhtIdl0w99glZogryMpvM8dbhk2Pe50Sdt16F4nfoRf+KdN+zIAolqPocLC+So2 gKm4xGZrXcckB9kcU/taBlPeQO9MncdjBrr4xmLHYoPx79Gsmbnjk7LtxiT7hy9crLVj mel1CoQfmoQCKCcCMAbSK0h5VIeK5MBb2cRoYdtsMaeGDTA+ud21bNraBWGZpXVylNu7 jhCG4GXphVxpmhorLH/fKxt91A6dAWW/oNAT6LzieZkrnEpufGVgGTxW8ADpkZbtabQx vjHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=bRM/B97TLVF6hLgZsriYieyCn1GwDI8hEh7ATDwFdLQ=; b=oXARdxn23dF1dn5AAUitHrCJBqJ1WmnRuagxpO64NXJPBxpO8uIk6z25Zl68pfzoIQ GRWRLuhFKkkcdiUBiVztuvndyFw3724+837hooDdljAMsXZjS+Ahwh8jEH5P+vQpv7T5 KmeJjbnovNrb0/PQutAQI9KEeHfugwDQnga3+4eDt/k2nB7Y1GcZ3ITAmKuDJ7gPk3jl cT9aXrYlFpYx4HGsaMKvkEpEARV3jV5ZD8nIKT8LlhGtX0reLZnxfF2P+z4LieSJbyXL Ir4+Gy5iiBk3lg2l2t1rqmzVrEvlmNlbJNVYdqM2tNmluQ0LK2OMm4aCNUF24jFiBzqV m5YA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDyyJ/F/kh4TnqC75VvcbSMF+MFqNjyBusgBFrM0aEPJnFxh+qz tqr6JQLd2+xtAif9Sg5NWBTHgSHP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/BJwLTuIknzf9rZR2klf0iQ6ttLjLgcwzxkT9MwHwQdLTzqrydRLyn9+p9otxy4nBtkmeVDQ==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:9cc5:: with SMTP id h5-v6mr4474530wre.11.1524140056522; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.129.51.218] ([80.69.10.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 58-v6sm7205263wrv.41.2018.04.19.05.14.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
To: li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>, Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
References: <152363066886.26321.3212300538180273898@ietfa.amsl.com> <HKXPR0601MB1799868866AF89F9699EAF28FCB10@HKXPR0601MB1799.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> <20180415160956.GC66082@shrubbery.net> <ace47a71-0e9d-6a0d-ae37-1f4bc48ada0b@stevecrocker.com> <20180416232930.GB47095@shrubbery.net> <20180417154859.GA59765@shrubbery.net> <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A6D64432@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <SINPR0601MB18056406ADDD40B5AEF9ABCBFCB50@SINPR0601MB1805.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <57512281-f190-916b-60f5-d27ee2cd37a1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:14:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <SINPR0601MB18056406ADDD40B5AEF9ABCBFCB50@SINPR0601MB1805.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------F4D3E3092DF760058B9B2797"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/us4QirtbSXyWH1rMlIDJDbfc_Jo>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] =?utf-8?b?5Zue5aSNOiBSRTogUnRnZGlyIGVhcmx5IHJldmlldyBv?= =?utf-8?q?f_draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06?=
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 12:14:21 -0000

Could you provide any more details on what specifically is being 
patented? Given that the document does not define new protocol mechanics 
and only adds in codepoints and element encodings, what can be 
practically patented there?

Ignas



On 19/04/2018 10:14, li zhenqiang wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We have updated the IPR Disclosures. The application number is given. 
> At present the IPR that MAY relate to this draft is a patent 
> application in China.
>
> I have to say that we do the IPR Disclosures following the IETF IPR 
> rules and procedures.  We think the disclosed patent application MAY 
> relate to this draft, so we did the IPR disclosures. Whether or not it 
> is really related to this draft depends on the lawyer's judgement.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Zhenqiang Li
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
>
>     *发件人:* Tianran Zhou <mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>
>     *发送时间:* 2018-04-18 07:00
>     *收件人:* heasley <mailto:heas@shrubbery.net>; li zhenqiang
>     <mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>;
>     draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all
>     <mailto:draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org>;
>     opsawg <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
>     *主题:* RE: Rtgdir early review of
>     draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06
>     I think it worth the authors can discuss about this IPR in the WG
>     before sending the draft to IESG.
>
>     Tianran
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Sent from WeLink
>
>     *发件人: *heasley
>     *收件人: *li zhenqiang<li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
>     <mailto:li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>>;rtg-dir<rtg-dir@ietf.org
>     <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>>;gen-art<gen-art@ietf.org
>     <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>>;draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all<draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org
>     <mailto:draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.all@ietf.org>>;ietf<ietf@ietf.org
>     <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>>;opsawg<opsawg@ietf.org
>     <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>>
>     *主题: *Re: Rtgdir early review of
>     draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06
>     *时间: *2018-04-17 23:49:16
>
>     Why is there IPR on this draft? Is this because of section 3?  A
>     section
>     that is unnecessary and could be entirely removed without
>     affecting the
>     draft in any manner?
>
>     Otherwise, I think it absolutely absurd that there is IPR on this
>     document.
>