Re: [OPSAWG] QUIC-LB
Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Thu, 10 September 2020 14:04 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238FC3A0ADA for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=0.5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BALNsbXmaL32 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A9033A0C25 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id q6so5705307ild.12 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=h/A/X4Wag2nzabxMl9PAdl/7C1C5hhlTa7dWsHtaU1s=; b=E5+MDn0b5IRa+YDGWTw027zblRg3vjGjUPyms1t+tF+o7EXmhXSMWDVv6vg1JMm0Hy 5aOd8J0lbPjqipsrqmKTStldXnweCot9cxeNtOTEIdnf/EJJFzf0rvnMovOG2gkt2TAo cddM/U3AvXwbzbtzbaLR6FwA2pWp6X6PaFuoKCP4drT+WwbMnhLp9+lU9MBA9A2jdT63 awjHY/TAd51Rf9j68WtnvV8UOOMU8LgwTjgtV3yttmRu7G1ZEPd84F+5aCA+ucvff33S yq1TcZT5VAzjrFlLXL7n8SjuYSsZVkm3WiihTriEdGRyMP0LHy6JS/oHpAzK0/UkAWKY M9wA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h/A/X4Wag2nzabxMl9PAdl/7C1C5hhlTa7dWsHtaU1s=; b=p3nHZHJwjABrBG4kQ6EKT3opxU2cPlfOvgRPfwnJuocOOMHbDSOiAc3mLAvrZUZ9dh M7bBOiPr9XWPAwGAWliZ4PfhKX2UcfEezaFFsdr0CKONY7hzCMZVTKnDTc5mvhh+3OAE DuHisjaSVauBGMgdMTDYVF5tRS7lqDwFeWmhZn4d5RNEm5OwmgxCUWsAEwlQ9sxy+5Cj e55XuijL7X2YPuAgAYJgA7AbyKPG73NVlXDVQuR7UF3PzCkeb44W2Z4moAmd1NGbKpVX hOREhSWFwUgWjxBhhseaiPDkDYyRaKU4fgc6XEUviKQ1vv7E6pYxfwxMpjWRXUkLbYX4 S8xA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/gThtPIFViE/+VHms9Iyoe+xQN+i7+wH7GFaskOQF82NF8xWZ G3cSZO5ZszL9m2BMgsh844lcNZIqxVmCaw4C6q9p3rqZ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw78awxeJtIiHDc+vNmAlT3INmA5WqRLuyrnr3gnokvAdXxWe3iYHehmR1qH8G2T0xF0DL6fBGImnIza3mxsMU=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:b74c:: with SMTP id c12mr8234063ilm.237.1599746656804; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM4esxTHu-tWVjCOcKv5kFr35t7RXUyU0eiUni_uXVRrjFNrRQ@mail.gmail.com> <5364.1599699453@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <5364.1599699453@localhost>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:04:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxTvVe6jg1RaPabCSAc7Wt4OjmDUMUWJva_GAwCB_+frFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000035a55b05aef60b47"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/wlbcPsCMxAhvUHfq05YaVheqj9k>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] QUIC-LB
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:04:55 -0000
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > Don't the CDNs, and "Big Tech" companies basically inhouse develope many of > their own L4 load balancers? So if you have > Apple/Azure/Facebook/Google...? > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > Yes, so if you're a cloud customer of one of those, it would be great if the QUIC servers you're deploying are fully supported by those load balancers. That requires a standard.
- [OPSAWG] QUIC-LB Martin Duke
- Re: [OPSAWG] QUIC-LB Michael Richardson
- Re: [OPSAWG] QUIC-LB Martin Duke