Re: [OPSAWG] [Fwd: Your thoughts on draft-richardson-mud-qrcode]

["RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Tianran,

In my opinion, work that is in scope for an existing working group must
first be offered to that working group. If the working group has no
interest in pursuing it, that is OK and it can be brought to the
Independent Stream provided it does not conflict with ongoing work in the
working group.

Of course, I can form my own opinion on whether there is interest in the
working group, and I can make my own judgement about conflict, but it is
helpful if the working group chairs can give advice because they should
have a better understanding of what the working group thinks.

Best,
Adrian

Tianran Zhou wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> IMO, whether to apply ISE or WG adoption depends on the authors
> themselves.
> If I recall right, we did not get the adoption request from the
> authors.
> We welcome MUD related work, and we will consider from many aspects,
> like:
> 1. any conflict to existing solution
> 2. wg interests
> ...
>
> But anyway, the WG mailing list could always be the place we can
> discuss about this technique.
>
> Best,
> Tianran
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel) [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 6:20 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: [Fwd: Your thoughts on draft-richardson-mud-qrcode]
>
> Hi OPSAWG chairs,
>
> I wrote to you at the start of Janusary about draft-richardson-mud-
> qrcode/ which is derived from draft-richardson-opsawg-
> securehomegateway-mud
>
> My question was whether, in your opinion, this should be in the OPSAWG
> or it is OK for it to be published in the Independent Stream.
>
> I also wondered if you are aware of any history related to the document
> that you could share with me.
>
> I see from the mailing list that Michael has raised the draft on the
> list a couple of times, but without any follow-up.
>
> What I'd like to know (and the WG can contribute to this discussion) is
> whether this is something that the WG would like to complete and
> publish in the IETF stream.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> --
> Adrian Farrel (Independent Stream Editor), [e-mail]
>
>


-- 
Adrian Farrel (ISE),
[e-mail]