Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats

Robert Story <rstory@tislabs.com> Thu, 14 April 2011 02:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rstory@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3707E07CC for <opsawg@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X4xTY1dJd-y5 for <opsawg@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2740E07C7 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D15928B0040; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:52:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ispx.vb.futz.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E761A1F8051; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:52:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:52:35 -0400
From: Robert Story <rstory@tislabs.com>
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <20110413225235.3a9edf63@ispx.vb.futz.org>
In-Reply-To: <001a01cbfa0c$72904480$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
References: <3D50A761-7279-4564-A8EA-6CBAAD62CC84@cdl.asgaard.org> <4CD5A6BA-7C3C-42ED-9CBB-9ACDB3F7F77B@quittek.at> <20110331122844.7503ed87@ispx.vb.futz.org> <AANLkTimw2vV7PE3jd0neRZLeRVGOXXsZ7YYpB0YrHbmU@mail.gmail.com> <000401cbf7fd$1b8b6d60$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <001a01cbfa0c$72904480$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
Organization: SPARTA
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Sig_/uazzumjt4Ja7FkUQ7hbcOzc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 02:52:41 -0000

On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:56:06 -0700 Randy wrote:
RP> We've reached the end of the time allocated for WG last call
RP> on this document.
RP> 
RP> Two changes (see below) were proposed.
RP> 
RP> Are there any objections to including these two changes in an
RP> update to draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats- at this time?
RP> I do not believe that either of these changes would
RP> necessitate a second WG last call, and that we should
RP> then be ready for hand-off to the IESG.

I support both changes.

--
Senior Software Engineer
SPARTA (dba Cobham Analytic Soloutions)