[OPSEC] A couple updates and rename for draft-camwinget-opsec-ns-impact

"Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com> Fri, 29 May 2020 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ncamwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD9F3A107E for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=ZBk5mcuX; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=lT0GmkCK
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wN9QL_m2N7eJ for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9253A107C for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4259; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1590785929; x=1591995529; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=C9Zn4dGMdT1lHrhFWexTbEw529ztixCajlS9Lzd6aTM=; b=ZBk5mcuXrgOdCOCShq+LHts/TnL023N5SiegEO0olaF1FqRibwtAG21e udjEn+V/dof2xQUza1patX+9AJTrUDTdeDTr2ELA//qe2De2GQlwdzEQR tTDvdaqUnC5Q/Egs5RW8TZLOe/xna8DiZmzhUOGMxKHOE7usrPkemYYnJ 4=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AkAJHfBdo6ZHy9nthmIcVRtvGlGMj4e+mNxMJ6p?= =?us-ascii?q?chl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwaQB9fa5u5Kze3MvPOoVW8B5MOHt3YPONxJWg?= =?us-ascii?q?QegMob1wonHIaeCEL9IfKrCk5yHMlLWFJ/uX3uN09TFZX/akHc5Hqo4m1aFh?= =?us-ascii?q?D2LwEgIOPzF8bbhNi20Obn/ZrVbk1IiTOxbKk0Ig+xqFDat9Idhs1pLaNixw?= =?us-ascii?q?=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BICAAzd9Fe/5xdJa1mHgEBCxIMgX8?= =?us-ascii?q?LgSEvUgdvWC8sCoQbg0YDoSSEZ4EugSQDVQsBAQEMAQEjCgIEAQGERBmCCwI?= =?us-ascii?q?kNgcOAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQYEbYVZAQuGCxEdAQE4EQEMPgIEMCcENYMEAYF?= =?us-ascii?q?+TQMuAQ6mDAKBOYhhdoEygwEBAQWBNgKBEYJNGIIOAwaBOIJkgkmHGBqCAIE?= =?us-ascii?q?4HIVyAQEDgg+CZzOCLZFvhiebMQqCVIgxkDoenhSQXYlzj2qEEwIEAgQFAg4?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQWBWgYsgVZwFWUBgj5QFwINkECDcoUUhUJ0NwIGAQcBAQMJfItLAYEPAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,450,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217";a="487378458"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 29 May 2020 20:58:45 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04TKwiIU007944 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 20:58:44 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 29 May 2020 15:58:44 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 29 May 2020 16:58:43 -0400
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 29 May 2020 15:58:43 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=L1KzCMhHrSAqUuUhs1YdoQlMESTKhiZcGwWWfjXvwnPCsPSYm63CdC+MTSZi2Np7XQm5R2oXKs7ojHRp19d3eXAsYk84mj+6OrBNZ3aDvAwJxVUBVXZKey2cJKCEcMih3dPJBTTdeC+zkjLB6cZ4SQguYVUMz1S3c5tby03VBLt12qIKnPm0aoYTN5vW9In2XxW0C9CH89JcjwmkVh55qrQ5rjYjSDSAnqHzMeQ36vAbevxTZ7R2HpzsOtwfOfNjMzAvj6f7pdSEAB5FUZ3ZzIxdFSBB6lpxYBhiIt50vGb1TRFVYUlDrmDQjDNHM+CGSAs4i0/doyp4zvbDNZWU9g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=C9Zn4dGMdT1lHrhFWexTbEw529ztixCajlS9Lzd6aTM=; b=dO2C2+HXXVy8aYw5nK8izbQ1nqJNcg90RstxyL9gP5Fk6HbOlJTgB4f+dP49mnV91rOmydkp8+hW7QdzgA2QaCuOATLK/jTO7EMT7lKqd0Dl62rcaS2535+zQDgP7XSuShEpjMMzU3fjyUtpTPT+gk5ivh0r9c1B8qR8g5XLbMj72ya3ag+EspmDpWt7TWA3+rObAMO2Mz+uKsQALcey87xKi4ZY6Bm/DuotDlVVHSCwEhUKyH283oh7yHe8TbJc5/Uu2E+iRkp2zpupjHLgOdpGkbkEtmphPPZY2AkfYdQSRmkOKrppylW8uwFtyjF05/Lz5Iz48nGdKGyZquIsZA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=C9Zn4dGMdT1lHrhFWexTbEw529ztixCajlS9Lzd6aTM=; b=lT0GmkCKokBboPsKLZo+rNwvlx5Wmwnue/0qpFzdBx3dRHJA9/9yYKXzEu8YrxFu5YnoYnX0fPZiVG2azDBQESnHoG7szoKYGGCP1NuL75mS+/XPPnjYUwLFbS4MfitnZuSy/OnjBy3zqvHwgpdYrNVXMxSVJUzoWt/L0WdfwC4=
Received: from BY5PR11MB4070.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:181::16) by BY5PR11MB3910.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:185::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3045.19; Fri, 29 May 2020 20:58:43 +0000
Received: from BY5PR11MB4070.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::101e:db5b:b661:949]) by BY5PR11MB4070.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::101e:db5b:b661:949%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3045.018; Fri, 29 May 2020 20:58:43 +0000
From: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>
To: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: A couple updates and rename for draft-camwinget-opsec-ns-impact
Thread-Index: AQHWNfvvkrL2G7b1O0q87wiofM8fbQ==
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 20:58:42 +0000
Message-ID: <D6F78F07-48B3-49EC-994A-119B15303B55@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.16.200509
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [73.162.233.180]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d42824aa-f17e-4a4f-910e-08d804131249
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB3910:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR11MB391055D28CE59E3B5FF6CC1FD68F0@BY5PR11MB3910.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 04180B6720
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: irkMLTPvQCUKRgrik4nvk5pwnup8aV4ca7gG2qfUpb/yRzrR28HKz04UIkZrI0mob2afdmgL+FvOamsKn5xQyEWFfHPhrFgC8l9DyMNWIxaMfyjPNrlrxa08xkrmO9Edwtqas07ke47qTY4S0X1DWpMaSJqacpwjilolXA1IB71ShMvYInUl0txR66n+LL99Uamr6Z3qzSwNG2GlY9PRnuWeA0M0Z0fcfnqL1+7ryw2+xfdX2AMHXLBmj6C0U7L2yBgXXsNy2Jm5YDdis7nD+WzwIVNlhR+6RmFc6vJoYb3IXQI+vIwCDW6TkHjLeSs2uQVqYH+ltsx50QXbzOOfqS5BQohd1Kirnq/Lxrn1Ug7WD9TjBZ/iNE8ZY2gbJ1R+4NUR92bw/Mwonn9wPdEHJg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BY5PR11MB4070.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(376002)(136003)(33656002)(66556008)(76116006)(6506007)(316002)(66446008)(8936002)(6916009)(64756008)(166002)(8676002)(2616005)(6512007)(186003)(66946007)(66476007)(26005)(478600001)(2906002)(36756003)(4744005)(86362001)(6486002)(5660300002)(71200400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D6F78F0748B349EC994A119B15303B55ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d42824aa-f17e-4a4f-910e-08d804131249
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 May 2020 20:58:42.9296 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 0hOSAObxWy2nct2oXuHs+hasljJ4ue/tqC98zbqLcqhGBPFtoSLMf96enbA7L2nMRQh6q+VL02mdp/7QZEC6zA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR11MB3910
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/1-SOBjgjHCScOGvcBJXwrQTYG88>
Subject: [OPSEC] A couple updates and rename for draft-camwinget-opsec-ns-impact
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 20:58:51 -0000

Hello OPSEC participants,

I’d like to thank Juergen and Warren for the comments to the draft.  We have made clarifications to the TLS proxy scenarios as pointed out by Warren and as suggested by Ron, have renamed the file draft-camwinget-opsec-ns-impact<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-camwinget-opsec-ns-impact-00> as it fits better in the opsec charter (vs the tls wg).

Would welcome more comments and feedback!.

Thanks, Nancy (on behalf of my co-authors too)