Re: [OPSEC] WGLC: draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-02

"Lubashev, Igor" <ilubashe@akamai.com> Thu, 18 April 2019 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ilubashe@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2642B1203E1; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.363, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4V6XKo1F9WbP; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 907E21203E9; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3ILqsrt010680; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 22:54:09 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=/Jn0e5X6tPLY1uBa4FGI02FlEeyZxOCSr/5RFUBqFQY=; b=ZEMN7va+D98AahindrPmwTtPkAbtjO7FiUetCl1dEYaEVs2uc84A9Aqv7BTQhU1FOCLJ B0VzvzYlAUBCvL/PN6SL2YHpF37auDPpwWg6nch5oc/da023MvagL6URKji45GnKzc9q GZUZs8J+MMB6tUkTLgttOuiCdQ7QiJfUYZWdGpeRT1uD0RgZEIHtXAcCyjIdKZQT7ojR 536abmZApaCSCpRFZnpo+bGYNNSKpZqJaLPxqHU06UucLfgt7a7c+QUBt3F9G8oUM0LI rFpdumraOXjLM111ORzzdb8ch15hvw0UD42tUCzcAVJF3Tz6dj+AK1GuHm9FDs6XQL9m Jw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [96.6.114.87] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rxtpqheeb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 22:54:09 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3ILWOJg016820; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:54:08 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2rub3vqure-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:54:08 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:54:06 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.105]) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.105]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:54:07 -0400
From: "Lubashev, Igor" <ilubashe@akamai.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC: draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-02
Thread-Index: AdTq7wx+AUPz0gXiQFWZG7KWOvJavwLQKZ1g
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 21:54:06 +0000
Message-ID: <32dddaae3c71401294bb4760f5671e64@usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <BYAPR05MB4245F199CD695857393E587CAE500@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR05MB4245F199CD695857393E587CAE500@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.152.52]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-18_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=882 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904180127
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-18_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=883 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904180128
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/1th3Iw4qrLlfoS3bK295VM1X4AI>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] WGLC: draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-02
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 21:54:13 -0000

I have reviewed the updated draft.  It is well written and addresses a real problem.  The draft describes a viable mechanism to improve SAV for complex deployments, and I am particularly pleased that it allows for incremental deployment.
I support advancing the document.

- Igor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2019 10:04 AM
> To: opsec@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org
> Subject: [OPSEC] WGLC: draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-02
> 
> Folks,
> 
> This message initiates a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-
> improvements-02. Last call will end at COB on 4/18/2019.
> 
> 
>                                                    Ron
> 
> 
> Non-Juniper
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec