Subject: Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
From: Merike Kaeo <[email-masked]>
To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <[email-masked]>
Cc: Gunter Van De Velde <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 18:54:32 -0700
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>

Just as Ack re capturing all the comments and discusisons and working with other co-authors to resolve.

If anyone is at RIPE meeting and would like to discuss, let me know.

- merike

> On May 4, 2017, at 11:39 PM, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Authors from draft-ietf-opsec-v6 and OPSEC WG,
> 
> There has been significant discussion during WGLC for this document and during the process indications that group consensus is on some topics is not reached yet.
> Last message from Merike indicates that draft authors will work on capturing all comments and resolve them with ‘group consensus’.
> 
> I’ll be waiting for an updated document and check with authors and WG when time is ready for a fresh WGLC.
> 
> G/
> 
> From: OPSEC <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>> on behalf of Gunter Van De Velde <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> Date: Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 09:39
> To: "[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> Subject: [ALU] [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
> 
> This is to open a two week WGLC for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6>.
> If you have not read it, please do so now. You may send nits to the author, but substantive discussion should go to the list.
> 
> 
> I will close the call on 26 April 2017
> 
> 
> G/
> Sent from iCloud
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>