Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt
KK Chittimaneni <kk.chittimaneni@gmail.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 22:11 UTC
Return-Path: <kk.chittimaneni@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5EE120071 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00lhqL2rDtU3 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 654FB120025 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id p59so3026530edp.7 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9ElQGg6i2uyx+h+00Kaer0gtVbqvn17WoO1oUxZcLBk=; b=KyMjY0sbPfHcmpzEFl6j1nMw/XkkBikCJ2OzjzEprd/6VQW/YsJkicMrCuMBoCHHKB gRuUGx5kLlEkCYSjIF2AcKp0Dh/ElC/6PsbopUcn4kM9548pjRffjEJItDkIC/ex2FAV NrF76zKsoNkXvBlgB0LIyWVSUe9EzikVHT88s8uQA0hgvUJk9H1yObbZ+1LWSbR10nFZ GixXRk/CgyHdPnx4kKPCyvlfm/rw4Tn9PIkca4fQpZGEHN6yXeSz0+FCasfO42mj4n3O hAqSEsN80HHlDVvvdsXpEXgk7RR5sXY0hB+QMqBrlm4osmXz9XuRE6IN8Qg4d9D0PTbc Nv0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9ElQGg6i2uyx+h+00Kaer0gtVbqvn17WoO1oUxZcLBk=; b=J23ZNyeA0hhoqQ7j0vAskRXnDx0bpJl7aZzdCSYt8gb9n2VlwMwiM+QRTRMXrbTUD1 DK50wotMcsh6KfvTohznQxq7x0nL48gr3qJAO8Wk502ec73vaxrtx7l3IUlyjn3/1wUM 2ht+Uo1mq/JPertLCjfahcT44q1gMwfoevQ14a3KbesyWulTup4404R0djG+b2EH8vf/ pG1cwVSFW2wRGjyHCBRFduYDuwLEgw/GyFup6BZMRroiNSJr85c4vh88EmGYkDoQkFNN rNSsMAg6pSkLAxZKR2u68AgGErgs3AXEoWbtztBP0GNWcKab8HwX5bZSb9T2uVsknZtr dleA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW7b0pbBGMTCF3OxELjNP5p066bqvCzEiB4zxTe6NTPonfp3Td1 lmv2PoLNMTQXzIx9OG5fzGTOEGEO3BqPWY6D7yw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwanMdX1wT/k0sc2UsDjvwvfr02I9ktVIrSv3T/x/sykzaV3RExakOvzSl6CNf4oLg9tq1/XO/TgtFA15IcIX8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:448e:: with SMTP id y14mr5837556ejo.136.1572041491689; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157086559138.1393.1472645196672102960@ietfa.amsl.com> <AD406E0A-4CAF-44FE-A583-3A6E4E4A0FD4@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB56997470CC6BB671C949202CAE900@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <C215E3D8-F896-442E-B5A3-DF112B0ED869@gmail.com> <ACE9142D-22EB-4A65-9B50-6BE750D295C4@cisco.com> <2C9BFAF1-63FE-43BD-9016-0A1F14CF79EF@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2C9BFAF1-63FE-43BD-9016-0A1F14CF79EF@gmail.com>
From: KK Chittimaneni <kk.chittimaneni@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:11:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+iP7bUVq3Z9AVxfLVbWKycoda29X5y4N=BGmj+W-QyDQuHY8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000af366f0595c36e98"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/59MXw9HSLrBDPxoDO3fn-lOj6sk>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 22:11:37 -0000
Hi Gyan, No IPRs on my end. Thanks, KK On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:36 AM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eric > > I am completing the Shepards writeup in essay format. Plan to submit in > the next few days. > > As far as WG consensus and history on the document from its initial I-D > state were there any nits other then what is public in the tracker or any > WG consensus issues or topics discussed that I should be aware of to > include in the write up. I assume we finally reached WG consensus on all > topics with no outstanding issues as we are now ready to publish. > > Are there any IPRs disclosed or outstanding. > > Regards, > > Gyan > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Oct 15, 2019, at 2:12 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com> > wrote: > > > > Gyan, > > > > Thank you very much for being 'victimteered' as the document shepherd > [1] __ > > > > Thank you Jen and Ron for your support > > > > Regards > > > > -éric and the authors -kk -merike -enno > > > > [1] see > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/edit/shepherdwriteup/ > (you need to create a free account on datatracker if not yet done), the > mailing list archive should also be a source of information > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/?q=draft-ietf-opsec-v6 > > > > > > On 15/10/2019, 01:54, "Gyan Mishra" <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Ron > > > > I read the document thoroughly in its entirety and do have valuable > real world experience in this space so I am volunteering. > > > > Not sure what I am getting myself into.😀 > > > > Gyan > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On Oct 14, 2019, at 7:14 PM, Ron Bonica <rbonica= > 40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> > >> Jen, > >> > >> I am ready to request publication. But before we do that, we need a > document shepherd. > >> > >> Eric, > >> > >> Was there anyone who was close to the draft, but not a co-author. We > can victimteer that person. > >> > >> Ron > >> > >> > >> > >> Juniper Business Use Only > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com> > >> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2019 3:41 AM > >> To: opsec@ietf.org > >> Cc: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>; Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> > >> Subject: Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt > >> > >> As you will notice in > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCfC0QrYg$ > this latest revision addresses a suggestion by Gyan Mishra issued during > the Working Group Last Call. Other changes are mainly replacing the > normative "MUST" and "SHOULD" as it is an informational document (so it is > now "must" and "should") + removing an unused informational reference. > >> > >> Jen and Ron, as the authors have addressed all comments received during > the WGLC (actually by only one reviewer) and the extensive review by Jen, > may I kindly request publication of this document? > >> > >> Thank you all > >> > >> -éric -merike - kk -enno > >> > >> > >> On 12/10/2019, 09:34, "OPSEC on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org" < > opsec-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > >> > >> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > >> This draft is a work item of the Operational Security Capabilities > for IP Network Infrastructure WG of the IETF. > >> > >> Title : Operational Security Considerations for > IPv6 Networks > >> Authors : Eric Vyncke > >> Kiran K. Chittimaneni > >> Merike Kaeo > >> Enno Rey > >> Filename : draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt > >> Pages : 52 > >> Date : 2019-10-12 > >> > >> Abstract: > >> Knowledge and experience on how to operate IPv4 securely is > >> available: whether it is the Internet or an enterprise internal > >> network. However, IPv6 presents some new security challenges. RFC > >> 4942 describes the security issues in the protocol but network > >> managers also need a more practical, operations-minded document to > >> enumerate advantages and/or disadvantages of certain choices. > >> > >> This document analyzes the operational security issues in several > >> places of a network (enterprises, service providers and residential > >> users) and proposes technical and procedural mitigations > techniques. > >> Some very specific places of a network such as the Internet of > Things > >> are not discussed in this document. > >> > >> > >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCVgtmnGd$ > >> > >> There are also htmlized versions available at: > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCQdAq-nG$ > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCTaFWv3h$ > >> > >> A diff from the previous version is available at: > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCfC0QrYg$ > >> > >> > >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >> > >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCXkuUebd$ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OPSEC mailing list > >> OPSEC@ietf.org > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCVjA-7t2$ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OPSEC mailing list > >> OPSEC@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > OPSEC@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec >
- Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt internet-drafts
- Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt Ron Bonica
- Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt Gyan Mishra
- Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt Ron Bonica
- Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt Gyan Mishra
- Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt KK Chittimaneni
- Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt Gyan Mishra