Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt

KK Chittimaneni <kk.chittimaneni@gmail.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <kk.chittimaneni@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5EE120071 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00lhqL2rDtU3 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 654FB120025 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id p59so3026530edp.7 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9ElQGg6i2uyx+h+00Kaer0gtVbqvn17WoO1oUxZcLBk=; b=KyMjY0sbPfHcmpzEFl6j1nMw/XkkBikCJ2OzjzEprd/6VQW/YsJkicMrCuMBoCHHKB gRuUGx5kLlEkCYSjIF2AcKp0Dh/ElC/6PsbopUcn4kM9548pjRffjEJItDkIC/ex2FAV NrF76zKsoNkXvBlgB0LIyWVSUe9EzikVHT88s8uQA0hgvUJk9H1yObbZ+1LWSbR10nFZ GixXRk/CgyHdPnx4kKPCyvlfm/rw4Tn9PIkca4fQpZGEHN6yXeSz0+FCasfO42mj4n3O hAqSEsN80HHlDVvvdsXpEXgk7RR5sXY0hB+QMqBrlm4osmXz9XuRE6IN8Qg4d9D0PTbc Nv0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9ElQGg6i2uyx+h+00Kaer0gtVbqvn17WoO1oUxZcLBk=; b=J23ZNyeA0hhoqQ7j0vAskRXnDx0bpJl7aZzdCSYt8gb9n2VlwMwiM+QRTRMXrbTUD1 DK50wotMcsh6KfvTohznQxq7x0nL48gr3qJAO8Wk502ec73vaxrtx7l3IUlyjn3/1wUM 2ht+Uo1mq/JPertLCjfahcT44q1gMwfoevQ14a3KbesyWulTup4404R0djG+b2EH8vf/ pG1cwVSFW2wRGjyHCBRFduYDuwLEgw/GyFup6BZMRroiNSJr85c4vh88EmGYkDoQkFNN rNSsMAg6pSkLAxZKR2u68AgGErgs3AXEoWbtztBP0GNWcKab8HwX5bZSb9T2uVsknZtr dleA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW7b0pbBGMTCF3OxELjNP5p066bqvCzEiB4zxTe6NTPonfp3Td1 lmv2PoLNMTQXzIx9OG5fzGTOEGEO3BqPWY6D7yw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwanMdX1wT/k0sc2UsDjvwvfr02I9ktVIrSv3T/x/sykzaV3RExakOvzSl6CNf4oLg9tq1/XO/TgtFA15IcIX8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:448e:: with SMTP id y14mr5837556ejo.136.1572041491689; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157086559138.1393.1472645196672102960@ietfa.amsl.com> <AD406E0A-4CAF-44FE-A583-3A6E4E4A0FD4@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB56997470CC6BB671C949202CAE900@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <C215E3D8-F896-442E-B5A3-DF112B0ED869@gmail.com> <ACE9142D-22EB-4A65-9B50-6BE750D295C4@cisco.com> <2C9BFAF1-63FE-43BD-9016-0A1F14CF79EF@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2C9BFAF1-63FE-43BD-9016-0A1F14CF79EF@gmail.com>
From: KK Chittimaneni <kk.chittimaneni@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:11:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+iP7bUVq3Z9AVxfLVbWKycoda29X5y4N=BGmj+W-QyDQuHY8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000af366f0595c36e98"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/59MXw9HSLrBDPxoDO3fn-lOj6sk>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 22:11:37 -0000

Hi Gyan,

No IPRs on my end.

Thanks,
KK

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:36 AM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Eric
>
> I am completing the Shepards writeup in essay format. Plan to submit in
> the next few days.
>
> As far as WG consensus and history on the document from its initial I-D
> state were there any nits other then what is public in the tracker or any
> WG consensus issues or topics discussed that I should be aware of to
> include in the write up.  I assume we finally reached WG consensus on all
> topics with no outstanding issues as we are now ready to publish.
>
> Are there any IPRs disclosed or outstanding.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gyan
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 15, 2019, at 2:12 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Gyan,
> >
> > Thank you very much for being 'victimteered' as the document shepherd
> [1] __
> >
> > Thank you Jen and Ron for your support
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > -éric and the authors -kk -merike -enno
> >
> > [1] see
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/edit/shepherdwriteup/
> (you need to create a free account on datatracker if not yet done), the
> mailing list archive should also be a source of information
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/?q=draft-ietf-opsec-v6
> >
> >
> > On 15/10/2019, 01:54, "Gyan Mishra" <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >    Ron
> >
> >    I read the document thoroughly in its entirety and do have valuable
> real world experience in this space so I am volunteering.
> >
> >    Not sure what I am getting myself into.😀
> >
> >    Gyan
> >
> >    Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On Oct 14, 2019, at 7:14 PM, Ron Bonica <rbonica=
> 40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Jen,
> >>
> >> I am ready to request publication. But before we do that, we need a
> document shepherd.
> >>
> >> Eric,
> >>
> >> Was there anyone who was close to the draft, but not a co-author. We
> can victimteer that person.
> >>
> >>                                                     Ron
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Juniper Business Use Only
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>
> >> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2019 3:41 AM
> >> To: opsec@ietf.org
> >> Cc: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>om>; Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
> >> Subject: Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt
> >>
> >> As you will notice in
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCfC0QrYg$
> this latest revision addresses a suggestion by Gyan Mishra issued during
> the Working Group Last Call. Other changes are mainly replacing the
> normative "MUST" and "SHOULD" as it is an informational document (so it is
> now "must" and "should") + removing an unused informational reference.
> >>
> >> Jen and Ron, as the authors have addressed all comments received during
> the WGLC (actually by only one reviewer) and the extensive review by Jen,
> may I kindly request publication of this document?
> >>
> >> Thank  you all
> >>
> >> -éric -merike - kk -enno
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/10/2019, 09:34, "OPSEC on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org" <
> opsec-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>   A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> >>   This draft is a work item of the Operational Security Capabilities
> for IP Network Infrastructure WG of the IETF.
> >>
> >>           Title           : Operational Security Considerations for
> IPv6 Networks
> >>           Authors         : Eric Vyncke
> >>                             Kiran K. Chittimaneni
> >>                             Merike Kaeo
> >>                             Enno Rey
> >>       Filename        : draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt
> >>       Pages           : 52
> >>       Date            : 2019-10-12
> >>
> >>   Abstract:
> >>      Knowledge and experience on how to operate IPv4 securely is
> >>      available: whether it is the Internet or an enterprise internal
> >>      network.  However, IPv6 presents some new security challenges.  RFC
> >>      4942 describes the security issues in the protocol but network
> >>      managers also need a more practical, operations-minded document to
> >>      enumerate advantages and/or disadvantages of certain choices.
> >>
> >>      This document analyzes the operational security issues in several
> >>      places of a network (enterprises, service providers and residential
> >>      users) and proposes technical and procedural mitigations
> techniques.
> >>      Some very specific places of a network such as the Internet of
> Things
> >>      are not discussed in this document.
> >>
> >>
> >>   The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> >>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCVgtmnGd$
> >>
> >>   There are also htmlized versions available at:
> >>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCQdAq-nG$
> >>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCTaFWv3h$
> >>
> >>   A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCfC0QrYg$
> >>
> >>
> >>   Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> >>   until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >>
> >>   Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> >>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCXkuUebd$
> >>
> >>   _______________________________________________
> >>   OPSEC mailing list
> >>   OPSEC@ietf.org
> >>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCVjA-7t2$
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OPSEC mailing list
> >> OPSEC@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>