IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] [TLS] Call For Adoption: draft-wang-opsec-tls-proxy-bp

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 05:24 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E9E3A0DE1; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ubKXB5_tP68d; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C70573A0DDE; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id t15so18083517iob.3; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2/ozDrFJZcICYETSaVKXqjH1pXy2y3ybqPuOB7h0csQ=; b=ooMgRO8MlYGCr7L0041XYULrTqKfleCDYgfjCRJqj71P1j/jcMioXSUMoIYdrZtbL6 7im5bTV0Q9Nuupd6g5O/0++1DATXJPztB6vX07JUKxDo+uBi3Vp/whprA7erjw1l1ErR 2AE7fcEhtdEqjhDkp85t4x7q1s6I49UkIl5/ZjZJlt7/u8IMA0zqcee+kWe4ssQpgxoU zPH22XfQsMejrk2JMrzzFJ0oK6q4+JUlh36yMnkr8Y08oCAmJW+8FFkmrBeMT52gZOF9 XhpKR/P2RENujAXPEALiY092MuFEUB29FVQqt2b3azYEUluCg1LmK5F/VU5okJKoUII1 4o7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2/ozDrFJZcICYETSaVKXqjH1pXy2y3ybqPuOB7h0csQ=; b=rfAVAq0VwpioiDL5RbUh3uf/LAViOVUm2UZ9Vw6HfP818OhgAUlJ1fYL4/S36iMmkL +Jx9xhbq6aQtnnyhjDKkw3ymU9E2LmiXzjyo9ujh68whgne+8Twzt7IL1x7N6FiDer8W j9B3Rap021JB0YIqTSvQEzH/ANrR2gUhxc92QymAw9JDl+ylxtuaVYak7x//myd+l5Dj pbqhWzo1M1fkp/95omWRL+us87hV8Svvm/7ZBBrc1nDfiURGhlyvKVAObh4P7UuNLd82 jofBT4JgvGDFy25ZdnA1/ib89nLctu8UQgsU6ekmUq6A1pUbKzBOD2yfVsj3iEiO5afH rhQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530OT4BOmpX9P0tTOwlzgiAu1QwDpxYiidiOPinL+HlXAxnpJzTz /TPPJgG+tw9lUGKtJXILwp8xkBQP4FtN8kY6CpM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+CVUrIBkrhbw7QRrCTWc2AuL2e8PO82TTWbUDma3Y4MW/gxInHxtcrbPEGMF6ayqmWknXqdoos2s6tk4AbAg=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9755:: with SMTP id c21mr28077037ioo.69.1596086649863; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR05MB634890A51C4AF3CB1A03DA0BAE7A0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <d9a9ea94-4c4a-40eb-8841-7a92fa31103e@www.fastmail.com> <34226646-93F3-4592-A972-A55B160D5B78@cisco.com> <CACdeXi+7oQgcg=-vFqxLnEFtg__6AehWXyE5ey8CBFiw9Vh8PQ@mail.gmail.com> <F40B9423-B0D5-4993-8A3D-D875C62951E4@cisco.com> <9e413fb1-da38-6a1f-8fca-a0dd5a6b6ebd@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBNyFBaHfKf5JGXb7BBc+pcwkLoSx2wYA63AZs0O-WRtug@mail.gmail.com> <32561228-08fc-79ea-1b2e-f5de87b9c8fe@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBOfVxoyds+vntEs+7ttrVkd2ppEvX+TdshS=AxA3kUQ7Q@mail.gmail.com> <3AC7B7C6-E616-40DA-95A3-A8DE7927E17F@akamai.com> <16DCF5D7-CC18-4015-ADE1-D67A3EBAEDB5@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <16DCF5D7-CC18-4015-ADE1-D67A3EBAEDB5@cisco.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:23:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwR5LBWzU=4kNBu3PDSN+0+mCKdhUu5OKx=L_xLY33kLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Eric Wang (ejwang)" <ejwang=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, OPSEC <opsec@ietf.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cbc1e405aba1e175"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/5EwYxELVHJPoNY3RnxyoNx-TVQ0>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] [TLS] Call For Adoption: draft-wang-opsec-tls-proxy-bp
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:24:12 -0000

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 9:48 PM Eric Wang (ejwang) <ejwang=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> To echo the ickiness part…   Putting on my end user hat, if I have to take
> it with an enterprise device on the enterprise network, I would rather it
> be done securely, respecting my privacy...  If I’m on my home network, I
> want an easy way to detect and reject it, no matter it is from a vendor,
> provider or state.  At this time, there seems no easy way on either side.
>

I don't think this makes sense.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email