[OPSEC][Errata Rejected] RFC7707 (8119)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 28 March 2025 17:46 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: opsec@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E57513E09FB; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 10:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id 4CCE61DF402; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 10:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: adurmanov@gmail.com, fgont@si6networks.com, tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20250328174631.4CCE61DF402@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 10:46:31 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: SHEOMOARAM2PUD4NKTAQLMFMWUGUNBHL
X-Message-ID-Hash: SHEOMOARAM2PUD4NKTAQLMFMWUGUNBHL
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-opsec.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, iesg@ietf.org, opsec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [OPSEC][Errata Rejected] RFC7707 (8119)
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/8aHh58ZGrcBQq9gkhJHuf5iUZP4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:opsec-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:opsec-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:opsec-leave@ietf.org>
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7707, "Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8119 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Anvar Durmanov <adurmanov@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2024-09-24 Rejected by: Mohamed Boucadair (IESG) Section: 4.1.1.1 Original Text ------------- 1. The "Universal" bit (bit 6, from left to right) of the address is set to 1. Corrected Text -------------- 1. The "Universal" bit (bit 7, from left to right) of the address is set to 1. Notes ----- The "Universal" bit is the bit #7 and not the bit #6. --VERIFIER NOTES-- Per https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/Qjj4KSQ-xFy7ZjPCwHTM_jiJKj4/ -------------------------------------- RFC7707 (draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-08) -------------------------------------- Title : Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks Publication Date : March 2016 Author(s) : F. Gont, T. Chown Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OPSEC][Errata Rejected] RFC7707 (8119) RFC Errata System