Re: [OPSEC] Request for opinions on acceptingdraft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02 as a working group document

["Smith, Donald" <[e-mail]>]

Accept, In my opinion this is a worthwhile effort.

[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Please cc the handlers to keep them all in the loop.
________________________________
From: [e-mail] [[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2009 12:05 PM
To: Joel Jaeggli
Cc: opsec wg mailing list
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Request for opinions on acceptingdraft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02 as a working group document

accept, as was the general feeling in the WG meeting (as I recall)

On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Joel Jaeggli <[e-mail]> wrote:
> I trust everyone had a eventful new year and I hope that for the sake of
> our industry the next six months doesn't look worse than the previous
> six months.
>
> Working from the the action items it's time to test consensus on accepting;
>
> draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02
>
> as a working group document.
>
> Commentary will be accepted through Friday January 9th.
>
> Thanks
> Joel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec