IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] WGLC: draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-02

Andrei Robachevsky <andrei.robachevsky@gmail.com> Sun, 14 April 2019 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <andrei.robachevsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1989120006; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 08:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r7OFxPpnuieL; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 08:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E45EB120058; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 08:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id g3so18419001wrx.9; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 08:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=cHSrpuSsPi6QpQxpNZqutVdqQgaprutFACgdkfXgsgA=; b=ZmEUjYbMhVvqmEYy/CppAPuQL2v4yN2UU3kP99TmxR580v7ixZnYrwJmr9OTp6KiIu ztWMlZAKZ/vAUUr5h4folgQzWRv8NJ0Q7tdlWSBA4vcmSY3wHeH3D7H5QxBNzBbygbyO AiIwWlqbHwH9vzQUB3oBJBPHA6DA/nqy0mmwZRApoFLCwTgpLD815G+jW9GtczGDf0nd Vs75X6OMn0vamtWp/q1lhE7JYXIG28Yb2qoysFKl7zFQYOV7UkGAwjVoZ0kjF7iripRt ZkVgW2Y3+6CPkDI+ubHE8MnQ0mJyviGkI1W1IBUtzz02CUMAjbejbd1N9c7DtwrZFkEH btFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=cHSrpuSsPi6QpQxpNZqutVdqQgaprutFACgdkfXgsgA=; b=Y2I5x+ZkySlUmB4OGhPyFv3+Ka/685vxj0MuQJwQAMkNr0e2V3ToREsRYm+K26DrHq C1BJFWa/n0sunBNYh9n65ueZRfcgOdOCYcOCSytbf8kwZt5ItaLD+A7cMBp9XiFI8G3H 2qgbar6CGNETRsTQnNn2CfiKWt4rXnzpe6VMUFcALQvz918EZF4UM2gkC3TPWA68oRLj gUTlWqncOWlAMlngaTprHjVzxbMU2BqIbwUNuhjZuwumuEFbTtx7h9GJHfKoXkEDvnte Y8jtq6dyZ5ERxvNpDmc4mjgCa30FMj4nZF+ECyehFZoOyINYYfG4PfYjRRXSj9vJ/qoQ gXEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW7V27Lljho8hOI3fts0VawqGDmuOx2ocQJA+MUtnHkfBIUw0Lh J3x7K+EiTaw0CLpTCnwYqqQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqybQgBjOY4aOccPtlxqqj9xiX88BpSxWBsoWDww+oMAyVjCEU64g25FLqMZMaY6e5cyzlUcfA==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:82c9:: with SMTP id 67mr22711950wrc.261.1555255632517; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 08:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from admins-MacBook-Pro-176.local (dhcp-077-250-131-147.chello.nl. [77.250.131.147]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r9sm12663584wmh.38.2019.04.14.08.27.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Apr 2019 08:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org>
References: <BYAPR05MB4245F199CD695857393E587CAE500@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Andrei Robachevsky <andrei.robachevsky@gmail.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=andrei.robachevsky@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQGiBD8L4TQRBACI+LX/GwEK23h5OXLU7iPeZc8FJ0ywH1vVqY/gT8VCs7YzbG4GNV6omEqa 0sDBF/eYKzLC5PfaKkHeAJ51eVIcDqYDhqYNlaxr5XPWWYjOIGvVRDmp4RKxhhDgXgKMmisW RrMCCP1njNQEWYtuB64UUNit1VXbQXn2FBpEXisqxwCg6hZK7Seg5md07iu9lYQx5rng+C0D /2TkPt4t80x3Iw8WV7TSLKdEQMRG42FMIFbaZIKbiEwvfaZYNrOckxdTr8l8LvwxNxHePsVi 1sqjBR8iwtogvLhSudqXxXsj2BiYfGSpTJoiVRPKdlEzo3i1mFPV/dNTSjovzWz5c21nW9kK fUIY43sLD5aynB9WITl9O6iawOrxA/0cOwOOVrpwHdLg+Uxb9y8C/1mx3o307hZDbn84Zare aiQNOn+ETI45ucON72OoMnuaBs3fJOoreXoaOSIxuM5gSQDY/SyDqncPhZmQX8yA52fuc3Ol 8qBjEomymafFymRUFvphEr/KD9BpyBZqM41zrT5VEu2tk/ga5T+bC79W77QxQW5kcmVpIFJv YmFjaGV2c2t5IDxhbmRyZWkucm9iYWNoZXZza3lAZ21haWwuY29tPoh5BBMRCgA5AhsjBgsJ CAcDAgYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBGtZeFNYETVQoSYbeZY8+bWZrYo/BQJadGb/AAoJ EJY8+bWZrYo/pGgAoNlUk0Nu3km8dAtzOlrN5bveacodAJ4jwG65QN2EhvnTgHGQEybn9IjN 0LkBDQQ/C+E1EAQAvRN7YTDiGXS9OPLX5yDKBtvjQaR38t5zpi0ltuC5JITDKZdM6/9PCfJq QnMy+ngrI3VQdhxbduFrC5fBszo1vVMTwKrTD6D7BEsEgC3wNE5NzfzE/fjl0LkQMEf5Vxns jvbtYw2jfoyJFig2gdW4ojmBCge16RZwx7vK7Pn0z6MAAwYEAJ7zZZCCU2DZ/gPdfB3xPZVm 7XSMpG6GBz4mFGgJW/QeC2quqoKBeAEgf0icEM8ykEAPmpy8f6j0Fwe/qz/SgxOXfTlvH8O7 md6rx2t2D+1PM2PlYzwO37U5fqnPuzp5KMXlPPryuTWZmObgZMHHsko9BbpIcqNHqUNXzNwk +gjkiEYEGBECAAYFAj8L4TUACgkQljz5tZmtij/lFQCdGIvMimtJEiYiPIZYSvXI6hx8WOQA oMj/ni+WopJxWu947/5RyWR6AUpH
Message-ID: <e1025b64-b865-1356-7a0a-40141afe5c18@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:27:10 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR05MB4245F199CD695857393E587CAE500@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2ZMAkJCZqDwJzNkYN9tVckA6egNo75Qi6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/DPf7IKT7veGs_aOAzZ_tEiPH764>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] WGLC: draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-02
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 15:27:17 -0000

Hi,

I read the draft and I think it is ready to progress. In my opinion, the
suggested approach is an improvement over current uRPF modes and will
hopefully increase confidence in the deployment of anti-spoofing controls.

Regards,

Andrei

Ron Bonica wrote on 04/04/2019 16:04:
> Folks,
> 
> This message initiates a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-02. Last call will end at COB on 4/18/2019.
> 
> 
>                                                    Ron
> 
> 
> Non-Juniper
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email