[OPSEC] draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-crypto-issues
"Vishwas Manral" <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 29 December 2008 22:22 UTC
Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7928D3A67D0; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:22:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E01F3A67D0 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:22:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iIqvnk-Gowyq for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:22:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com (mail-bw0-f21.google.com [209.85.218.21]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226373A6452 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:22:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so16715985bwz.13 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:22:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=813dkU9Ov3imkmV/ZbLUJHv6n8s+CPHRAhtkeTICGOI=; b=LmNUP6DjN8zP6CzTslpAmnGdVp4gfqkcsGaW1ATh9fDKeXoF656HtB6oSb2fJ+ID4M ClJs4e7oJkan2vollSYYC5PIkP7Qcz6PRw57m24oERzxgzDI49K/bY7o26QV6tr3t2N6 LkTv7mV6v+mnHDRxPtqWkqdrc96Efi8SyIMdc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=mBgK0Le/DuFNkBFcRkqR6Bor8tRQRNzy6VqaMzjSu84ho55a9Su4DGuIxg+nNi63Uj H6PjIIQHb8SWh9Y/hZOkWB8e/IeLD9EObTDu1LBxwj35bDnafTOkWOX5LUNOH9H1JscP vmu1GFfX/WsMYJTln1Vz8oGwzUqUtiVv675iQ=
Received: by 10.180.253.20 with SMTP id a20mr1002368bki.19.1230589355906; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:22:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.209.3 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:22:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <77ead0ec0812291422w15cc540ey571c1c8e7c26e8ae@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:22:35 -0800
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: opsec wg mailing list <opsec@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [OPSEC] draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-crypto-issues
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Hi folks, I would want to know your view regarding adding a sub-section as part of the OSPF section about RFC2154 "OSPF with Digital Signatures " to the draft. I have heard a lot fo conflicting views about the same and would want to know your opinion before progressing further on the same. Thanks a lot to Ran for raising this issue. I personally am not sure if we want to add it. Thanks, Vishwas _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
- [OPSEC] draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-crypto… Vishwas Manral
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-cr… Glen Kent