Re: [OPSEC] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-07.txt

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Mon, 06 July 2015 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8338C1ACE41; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KLGotcYlr0Jz; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com [208.72.237.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568BA1ACE35; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB23861B27; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 16:05:23 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+pgzeugkt+O6yP5WtZ7tLsXhwC4=; b=NY7BwN tEmmB/ga+jSsHwsCXht0pwAqQqZKNJyIS2EHWhYY+P1rD1GbAKGV8wuEltK98kAB w03lD0noFZYkn7U6347y9m3sea1Kx77Px0Q/uTQVCwFMMiN3OLSkNOSpc5o46MZN G+5WmSt/DAoO2wDz8RpFE3wPFrNSfrPirTkOw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=mD+VJEowv7I2453Bj7JmYSaMeoQbSZxu 02D1zfexThKU1YCoQnoyZf9J+T0kFao+pN+MWTwQlDQRtaIfCbI5e3oCd2ox3PBC x9DYYPUBjSKnWBD4+jgznCv76V7FlOGGmGZCvctw2vre39bikn77kMrcWLVLOOFP XkbazY7OZsM=
Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9782B61B25; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 16:05:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com (unknown [209.85.218.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 172BF61B1C; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 16:05:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by oiab3 with SMTP id b3so7915109oia.1; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.184.3 with SMTP id i3mr498789oif.61.1436213122502; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.61.8 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <559ADAC1.20608@si6networks.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1506010905270.7187@shell4.bayarea.net> <559045AF.9060607@bogus.com> <559ADAC1.20608@si6networks.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:05:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CACL_3VFk5pchtg9TSqaBN2xnsMNmr37FhhDMxnMZdCcs5bgCtg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 55C08D78-241A-11E5-A84F-561A9F42C9D4-06080547!pb-smtp1.pobox.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/IUGSs6XFdaPDlzNB7ArhrUrquLg>
Cc: OPSEC <opsec@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.shepherd@ietf.org>, "opsec-chairs@ietf.org" <opsec-chairs@ietf.org>, Gunter Van de Velde <gunterv.velde@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-07.txt
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:05:25 -0000

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> We've rev'ed the document accordingly. It is now ready for publication.

Yes, -08 indeed looks like its ready to ship.  Thanks!

//cmh