Re: [OPSEC] WGLC: draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 18 October 2019 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A4E1202DD for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q3p8c5U1lVPJ for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF40D120103 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id a6so6576247wma.5 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=dvwnXDekKY76pmk3WpcFAi/qWYF7TioFpUASkT/VutI=; b=gEeWnGMoMyny7TwEgS7z75WkCYxSf+DFjBmVoCKvtJuW3wGGaO+Q2OIhU3rkTU2WbJ WjvDpVDphDoSVTcHoe8E8EvHIwe5627Utu+aD6slpZKbcJXW0P9CSiGnCpH/Hjeia8XB ova/v4L4py3Q8m+qlUIHn+7YaRF0e0IG30bUo092LNVoH41VXVR9+Z0L4RmyG6hP1N4p 6uNjAVOhwW+jQlRh3i9TIHAIr34DWuTqKwmbSmPmmnQpOgyzDNtxHTnpJv5cVvxYg6Ju WrrQImuyNRJOBT5xVHyITRJr+W4mCMZ+wPuVFLiif8tpbbfvaMeXIKxsaFLHB0PULAv8 UZnw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=dvwnXDekKY76pmk3WpcFAi/qWYF7TioFpUASkT/VutI=; b=ZWqI+XZSgHzHym0tYGpNkF0bk6i4BpPh367FxPdR0dAlVE8IIyQDWTjL1JA/uFkgu2 iFXHJ0fA+FAOJj2VgMlPRXlLps6YXmL523CM+TgtSR+22f62u1/EKpmqV5wEUSicsz17 QpKaKoFbB52711GFy79bEt3dpsyXZmnPqOoog9MI8iVr1bnLVWf9ZwaKhLBH/micZHUA iQ0vNnH9TLH01hYXqbxHke0CVigbEmCiT01rHkJ+8x+J8NdHwHw+ZyIhLmA4oJQUW144 3inL3/R9L935hRzxopUauwIv8/PfnM8+X9EopicbRndCEPDfp1d7BcBikU8TE8RwLrhw +HPg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXB52/0RFEI4tJQpBbPbmf/ERBJbO4SH8jGmRh/8+bwcLxxnYT+ SmWsMhuy+yTrvFvu3KL0jYg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMF7taMLA8rIoebP7RK58ZbK9pBLzXgKdheT32kHF3RQOjumDYlenUpL1f08r2DZ0ZnVmRcQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:10ce:: with SMTP id l14mr8063321wmd.15.1571412019407; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5a00:ef0b:b9bb:708e:1e8c:7603? ([2601:647:5a00:ef0b:b9bb:708e:1e8c:7603]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a192sm6160978wma.1.2019.10.18.08.20.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <2731CA86-139F-4004-B9DB-0F43729403E7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_91DE7E06-2C6B-4665-B950-FE2B5E9E46BC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:20:14 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CACL_3VGnhQNHXY+fB+BdFG+MqH3Hv+0iwoHOEWn-KkHOcS9iOg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, OPSEC <opsec@ietf.org>
To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
References: <CACL_3VGnhQNHXY+fB+BdFG+MqH3Hv+0iwoHOEWn-KkHOcS9iOg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/JuSbapV0DYrIk3pj2__L27KLA9M>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] WGLC: draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:20:24 -0000

I agree with Mike.  Without a discussion of the issues raised and how to resolve them, I think it’s premature to start a w.g. last call.

I also note that the draft expired January 3, 2019, over eight months ago.

Bob


> On Oct 18, 2019, at 7:58 AM, C. M. Heard <heard@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
> The document (version -06, expired 2019-01-03) is unchanged since last year's IETF last call that started in November 2018. That version drew a lot of substantive comments that have not been addressed (see thread starting at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KKyXXrvHa5r5mNcqlu_CbkktQmY). Isn't a WGLC without any discussion of these issues (not even to dismiss them) somewhat premature? Would it not be more appropriate to comb through the last call threads, extract the substantive comments, and make a considered decision what to do about each, possibly after submitting a new version without changes to un-expire the document?
> 
> As a reminder, one of the substantive objections raised was that the document recommends blanket discarding of unknown next header values, violating RFC 7045. Expect this to come up again as both a technical and process issue if it's not fixed (for the latter see Brian Carpenter's comments in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/c0DyXd_rLtMCrHQ3NmmRRGe7Z-A).
> 
> Mike Heard
> 
> On Thu, 17 October 2019 15:18 UTC Ron Bonica wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> This begins a WGLC on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering. Please post your comments by 10/31/2019.
> 
>                                                        Ron
> 
> 
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec