IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] minutes part 2

"Glen Kent" <glen.kent@gmail.com> Thu, 18 December 2008 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE4D3A6973; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:57:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F382D3A691E for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:57:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EIq52ab5b9Ns for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:57:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com (mail-bw0-f21.google.com [209.85.218.21]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E343A68B3 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:57:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so1838982bwz.13 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:57:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=FNzexRbpnGZ0dLlG0fMpuweubvBYBHIikNaPqUGlzmA=; b=SW4MdW0b2cM3Ysci9fEE2bYjhd/e7PzlDh8YAGGMmzgBE0yrFa+tb1ewIPhc2dI7yQ UlEb1rCtXDobYQPelwxUalKm3cLJc8M1WgQFuUCUmsT3P42ZOTF9FKkxL/HN9Ev3UN/d XIn9I4+YkMqMFcZqq9i6LvHD+MAVbCznmiQlE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Nm8CfzKr1iUGRTh1RVprl1A+m4pRsM7lTyJwXNzZUz0ATDjHBTX9t21d6c1BXDfv7R O78+u2jcyvFLTD5l0ynp93BvSi22fNX3GNhKPqc4g8JWUkQ7oe4jnygXozZR84pNnmWQ kG/GT+lXiG36ehhpLyHduiTL/ENGfQfqqs3rQ=
Received: by 10.103.244.4 with SMTP id w4mr816582mur.11.1229615823822; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:57:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.103.160.12 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:57:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <92c950310812180757k3cb258e0jcc42755c54df01f4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:27:03 +0530
From: Glen Kent <glen.kent@gmail.com>
To: R Atkinson <ran.atkinson@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6A3E6D7A-6475-4B5D-B3A9-F865D3133736@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <14198D76-AA32-4E02-9425-0700ED57B07B@gmail.com> <77ead0ec0812161759g4900bd98h6ad6c07bb0d81fe3@mail.gmail.com> <92c950310812171716j63bb07d5s2dcbd270fd8173ec@mail.gmail.com> <6A3E6D7A-6475-4B5D-B3A9-F865D3133736@gmail.com>
Cc: opsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] minutes part 2
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org

>>> No, it is not discussed in the document. The RFC you mention is an
>>> Experimental RFC. The draft talks about "Issues with Existing
>>> Cryptographic Mechanisms with Routing Protocols". We can discuss the
>>> same however (though I would feel it may not exactly fit the draft).
>>
>> You dont need to - its not required.
>
> You are formally declaring WG consensus ?
> Curious.

No, merely my opinion.

Glen.
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email