Re: [OPSEC] draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements

Jeff Haas <jhaas@juniper.net> Thu, 04 April 2019 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429E112066A; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.338
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.338 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.363, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bh2ZFEE6NfqO; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 393341200EC; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108163.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x34E693n024047; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:09:28 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=T2DGecAprnb9b5Uk+zE4+s3JAOEm99KzAc8uZZyf2B0=; b=INNK3FxhPbPhVMu/LD9YAchT+qnI183oDVtdo/C/7kJyJfxZJoW3J5c2a6lc4Lwuj47G IPFPiWBXF+TBk9NfVPdaIeJkWB9rEDZz9EziiviVUO9YoSJooL2rgoPIYKzhToAsKJFG vpiIenErrmKEOSwZipGXhmIcyY5MvCo/YByH29V3EFbkrQZ6jJXBbmnrhsPjWSq/79OY oK4a3cWfOhjj/Z3x7ky165EQ+9Zu5T9gG1iPxQhBZBUT9VXiCPRzZDRaB7gulgQSvx6+ ty4AnKAhtdIBgdDVXtB14vRozxrFf/yvKDij4rYudiQ8dkFikuqUyG+rcdNOzcFHHlAk Iw==
Received: from nam02-cy1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02lp2059.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.59]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rnf8sge77-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 04 Apr 2019 07:09:28 -0700
Received: from MWHPR05MB3151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.229.17) by MWHPR05MB2861.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.168.245.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1771.11; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:09:26 +0000
Received: from MWHPR05MB3151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e562:993e:cbf3:9557]) by MWHPR05MB3151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e562:993e:cbf3:9557%8]) with mapi id 15.20.1792.007; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:09:26 +0000
From: Jeff Haas <jhaas@juniper.net>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
CC: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements
Thread-Index: AQHU6vACxn2Pb4EaiUmEq/rglaH5Iw==
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:09:25 +0000
Message-ID: <963A3A3D-A334-47F2-8C95-FC8E4DE29DDA@juniper.net>
References: <BYAPR05MB42451F49E533EFC24217D44BAE500@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR05MB42451F49E533EFC24217D44BAE500@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3fac7615-9c1f-4e68-84f6-08d6b907253b
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MWHPR05MB2861;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR05MB2861:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR05MB2861140899E481D1DB3FFD7DA5500@MWHPR05MB2861.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0997523C40
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(376002)(39860400002)(366004)(346002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(256004)(7736002)(450100002)(66066001)(6436002)(6862004)(54906003)(1941001)(316002)(558084003)(36756003)(76176011)(305945005)(99286004)(6246003)(2906002)(81166006)(81156014)(8936002)(6636002)(4326008)(53546011)(486006)(6506007)(33656002)(25786009)(478600001)(83716004)(229853002)(86362001)(82746002)(8676002)(446003)(53936002)(26005)(11346002)(71200400001)(37006003)(68736007)(14454004)(6512007)(476003)(105586002)(3846002)(6116002)(5660300002)(186003)(102836004)(106356001)(71190400001)(97736004)(2616005)(6486002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR05MB2861; H:MWHPR05MB3151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: SLspq9oExl/rqia1PDcnyH50Sy867CD4L9pLLs/ue5m7lfVj4Kid9WPnkNKviLyMDVFl1kM396TNRpj0ULtk13QBJQwAiOZdk3ORB7DSKIVc6kHiWhUt/oBQruSLnhk66U2VS54+pykS/xjlHHiOPiJNwrvTDke50cMtTy/njvCu5A5uL0LZ1At3BYnmGLmbiIEVQI7DSslqpDOUgqpi2AaktKzc8rIpyU2bmfo22WpovR0DMqu9JE/9TUAw+RjcxvfIjcqs/bISjofmqYch3fb76zguM5Xv2iAnhrWCUG80pmTHdJTywQqd2XJ6v2jtJlvivOwjqPU/pyvOaZ5/Sd/GicuPzg1U95Gr4527F8zzRtjI99GcriYxo2VqAzAMoRX59Zz2g2qCKbfqi+PAW315GfZR4u+O2zYN1T8XTTw=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <F19F35F97006FF4E89FF48D6C89445B9@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3fac7615-9c1f-4e68-84f6-08d6b907253b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Apr 2019 14:09:25.9140 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR05MB2861
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-04_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=784 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904040091
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/PeNg0XXFFw0qWvMRp8Aa9nUlkmY>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 14:09:32 -0000

> On Apr 4, 2019, at 10:05, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> Authors,
> 
> Do you know of any IPR against this draft?

I am not aware of any IPR on this draft.

-- Jeff