[OPSEC] Request for opinions on accepting draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02 as a working group document
Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Thu, 01 January 2009 18:37 UTC
Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C903A6972; Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:37:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CF43A65A5 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:37:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.399, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ETSMROE1tzMo for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:37:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11023A6972 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.11.143] (c-67-171-158-173.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.171.158.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n01IbgvR009260 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jan 2009 18:37:43 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <495D0D77.3000204@bogus.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:37:43 -0800
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081119)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: opsec wg mailing list <opsec@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/8825/Thu Jan 1 14:56:46 2009 on nagasaki.bogus.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: [OPSEC] Request for opinions on accepting draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02 as a working group document
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
I trust everyone had a eventful new year and I hope that for the sake of our industry the next six months doesn't look worse than the previous six months. Working from the the action items it's time to test consensus on accepting; draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02 as a working group document. Commentary will be accepted through Friday January 9th. Thanks Joel _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
- [OPSEC] Request for opinions on accepting draft-k… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [OPSEC] Request for opinions on accepting dra… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [OPSEC] Request for opinions on acceptingdraf… Smith, Donald
- Re: [OPSEC] Request for opinions on accepting dra… bill fumerola