[OPSEC] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-03: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 20 August 2019 19:13 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9096120A18; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>, opsec-chairs@ietf.org, sandy@tislabs.com, opsec@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <156632839487.394.4368131465284019480.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:13:14 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/Ug2QfTtHmE8SdgONwZxjLHn86cE>
Subject: [OPSEC] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:13:15 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) I support Alvaro Retana’s DISCUSS point about the needed clarity on algorithm selection (A vs. B) and the security assumptions being made about Algorithm A. (2) Editorial -- Document header: s/Updates: RFC3704/Updates: 3704/ -- Section 2.1. Editorial. s/are maintained which list/are maintained to list/
- [OPSEC] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-iet… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [OPSEC] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
- Re: [OPSEC] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft… Roman Danyliw