[OPSEC] Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks (draft-ietf-opsec-v6) / Asking for WGLC
Enno Rey <erey@ernw.de> Sat, 06 July 2019 16:43 UTC
Return-Path: <erey@ernw.de>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813EE1200B1 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 09:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZTrrrdFaUeVD for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 09:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.ernw.net (mx1.ernw.net [62.159.96.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CB42120024 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 09:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.ernw.net (unknown [IPv6:fd00:2001:0:d001::30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail1.ernw.net", Issuer "ernw ca1" (verified OK)) by mx1.ernw.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED12D27304 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 18:43:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ws26.ernw.net (ws26.ernw.net [172.31.1.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ws26.ernw.net", Issuer "ernw ca1" (verified OK)) by mail1.ernw.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB1A020FEB9 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 18:43:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by ws26.ernw.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id EE5735AC81; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 18:43:16 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2019 18:43:16 +0200
From: Enno Rey <erey@ernw.de>
To: opsec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190706164316.GB53679@ernw.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/YhMKkDbpnFkwQHHGNHNBEf4BW6M>
Subject: [OPSEC] Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks (draft-ietf-opsec-v6) / Asking for WGLC
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2019 16:43:23 -0000
Dear WG Chairs, All, we've considered & mostly incorporated the input from the mailing list (thanks for the latest reviews and comments!) and from the IETF104 session, and we'd hence like to ask for WGLC of the document. thanks Enno -- Enno Rey ERNW GmbH - Carl-Bosch-Str. 4 - 69115 Heidelberg - www.ernw.de Tel. +49 6221 480390 - Fax 6221 419008 - Cell +49 173 6745902 Handelsregister Mannheim: HRB 337135 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Florian Grunow, Michael Schaefer ======================================================= Blog: www.insinuator.net || Conference: www.troopers.de Twitter: @Enno_Insinuator =======================================================