[OPSEC][Technical Errata Reported] RFC9424 (7964)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 30 May 2024 09:08 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE5A3C14F705; Thu, 30 May 2024 02:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id 408787FA60; Thu, 30 May 2024 02:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
To: kirsty.ietf@gmail.com, ollie@binaryfirefly.com, james.sellwood.ietf@gmail.com, andrew.s2@ncsc.gov.uk, warren@kumari.net, mjethanandani@gmail.com, furry13@gmail.com, rbonica@juniper.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240530090856.408787FA60@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 02:08:56 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: 5OYNIMP4MKEZJQN4YI7TABMUBILUBC6X
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5OYNIMP4MKEZJQN4YI7TABMUBILUBC6X
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-opsec.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: opsec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [OPSEC][Technical Errata Reported] RFC9424 (7964)
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/YoI3gTn9gR1Gqiov6hoMrKFSKs4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:opsec-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:opsec-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:opsec-leave@ietf.org>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9424, "Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) and Their Role in Attack Defence". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7964 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Andrew Shaw <andrew.s2@ncsc.gov.uk> Section: 3.2.3 Original Text ------------- At its simplest, this indicates that the receiver may share with anyone (TLP:CLEAR), share within the defined sharing community (TLP:GREEN), share within their organisation and their clients (TLP:AMBER+STRICT), share just within their organisation (TLP:AMBER), or not share with anyone outside the original specific IoC exchange (TLP:RED). Corrected Text -------------- At its simplest, this indicates that the receiver may share with anyone (TLP:CLEAR), share within the defined sharing community (TLP:GREEN), share within their organisation and their clients (TLP:AMBER), share just within their organisation (TLP:AMBER+STRICT), or not share with anyone outside the original specific IoC exchange (TLP:RED). Notes ----- The definitions of TLP:AMBER and TLP:AMBER+STRICT are the wrong way round in the original text. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9424 (draft-ietf-opsec-indicators-of-compromise-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) and Their Role in Attack Defence Publication Date : August 2023 Author(s) : K. Paine, O. Whitehouse, J. Sellwood, A. Shaw Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OPSEC][Technical Errata Reported] RFC9424 (7964) RFC Errata System
- [OPSEC]Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9424 (7… Andrew S2
- [OPSEC]Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9424 (7… James Sellwood
- [OPSEC]Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9424 (7… Warren Kumari