Re: [OPSEC] minutes part 2

RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com> Sat, 20 December 2008 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BC63A6A04; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:49:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E857C3A6A29 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:49:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.214
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.214 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.385, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VUpEny8e7inA for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A993A6962 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.30.20.71] ([72.84.80.181]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KC7003JP0HWESA0@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for opsec@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:49:13 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:49:08 -0500
From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
In-reply-to: <494D48B6.9090302@bogus.com>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-id: <73A1BD57-AE0E-45E7-9EFD-085E0D737DBA@extremenetworks.com>
MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
References: <EC3F7E1D-F7C8-484A-A0C0-1A25E79AD86E@extremenetworks.com> <77ead0ec0812160927j77bf42c6mbccef8ccf55d1e16@mail.gmail.com> <90F75653-21D6-4D2B-9472-52F2BDF7510D@gmail.com> <77ead0ec0812161118l3ca37732m541deb4c716a8f42@mail.gmail.com> <0C823E84-78EE-4234-9AD8-20688B0F8F55@gmail.com> <77ead0ec0812161616r5cc782c5j69415f75d4aa82bb@mail.gmail.com> <7EBC9C5C-EDF9-4CDD-8E1B-B9D05656ACAA@gmail.com> <494D48B6.9090302@bogus.com>
Cc: opsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] minutes part 2
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org

On  20 Dec 2008, at 14:34, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> Just as a point of order, I looked at the minutes and audio and I  
> think
> their existence in the dialogue as stated in the minutes is  
> accurate, if
> not work for word.

Joel,

I have never doubted that the minutes were accurate.
My disagreement is with parts of someone's comments
that were made during the meeting.

My apologies if I have not been clear on this (or
other matters).

Yours,

Ran

_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec