Re: [OPSEC] Anything to discuss at IETF114?

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Thu, 02 June 2022 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC03AC15AAC3; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 17:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.858
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.858 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Xf_Bc_MdXSY; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 17:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0565AC14F607; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 17:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id q123so3370698pgq.6; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 17:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YSfBFvbTIOneRUXqRf43b7MsvN+gQi7xJo9Az5i9E3M=; b=jBxze98yIg2TmjBd4FOC1xMyge/gbvSEagkJMG48bZdbtau6RyRU6Yvwchpja6AkzA +RWu0zjoZSV1pJHDQMmcCTJmTmlVoYhWCazSbdWETCxTfqoRDr35jp1DGDE5zUFf2yrm qqUxRaNlfIglFUmeIsQIGAOGphpl8HveJ0SjqJQnNneTslsdnBVzxqeGvQ9hFni8dd1f Yc42XQQnRyMwQVCo/Bnqa1beK8zuqP7rldRBSmAz8r52QQY9INJx02z7uuEa5iKw5fY7 7qgQ9Xu8vc3NvBkPTgKAQsqe45b3D+bXmiydZMJHRkff9XIHqGMxdyu8R4Jv9GuVeqKk s6dA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YSfBFvbTIOneRUXqRf43b7MsvN+gQi7xJo9Az5i9E3M=; b=62nRdkfEgM8yv0nTqWYY4RMNv69bQ0RUpOvw640J4UqKV8RseQv8N+NbuiODt48LYB x0jPhxVbxDwKKBJNAeSYtrbvQ9IvcRQepmjvXXcDU+WI//18dhCXQHemmNAu6X2HIU5a nZ7oufnfeVXkMLOudXhnBkQZ65N5/tvvxpd0svBnRPfaz8VHWdLIPvGG1uW99MxiH5bx FebBHqS0nxsND80BpwIqlvlpqhYNbaxsZi+srkILCmFcMrjfdkKUjElXGcmxXMX8942T BDYGaBCU/KAXtsElES/15beekbiMh70qURLCvmMZWRzhFsn5q6azWYoQqpHUmONY9iOv Yihg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tHtPlktC6CmclnutvOKJR8EoaiqIl+W4AJMFxYHwFxcgHuCIA W6GTRp58dz+HMeUVPd8eyqLAmjI9h9PV4qjYvIA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyoeUmz2o0X3Hrkn9Vlo/k9w1OrQ9DTgjY4O3gN9itjrH1zNtvwz4sZRyjvvlxdFzjX2OQKoTSwNS6d+eHN7j0=
X-Received: by 2002:a65:4c4e:0:b0:39d:21c4:2381 with SMTP id l14-20020a654c4e000000b0039d21c42381mr1810781pgr.566.1654130889857; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 17:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFU7BAQUtfO2w2+Dqaiz0T-P9J-GSbhj4zmYaQj+a-7U92-OtA@mail.gmail.com> <F001CAFC-4FC2-4B5C-A4EA-BD0ACD11E91E@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F001CAFC-4FC2-4B5C-A4EA-BD0ACD11E91E@cisco.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 10:47:58 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFU7BATKTYpwWdXXtbi65oJenR6DvQ5riNa=tN09yjDyF=8cTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: opsec WG <opsec@ietf.org>, OpSec Chairs <opsec-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/dDDu6p37mtjnEMrbe8xAc2QpgbA>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Anything to discuss at IETF114?
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 00:48:14 -0000

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 1:07 AM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com> wrote:
> While I understand that draft-vyncke-opsec-probe-attribution is really too light to be the only agenda item, if OPSEC meets, then I would appreciate to have 10 minutes to present this I-D.

OK, as we have another agenda item, I'll request a short slot.
>
> Regards
>
> -éric
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OPSEC <opsec-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, 24 May 2022 at 04:13
> To: opsec WG <opsec@ietf.org>
> Cc: OpSec Chairs <opsec-chairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: [OPSEC] Anything to discuss at IETF114?
>
>     Hello,
>
>     So far we do not have any agenda for the OpSec meeting at IETF114.
>     If you have an agenda item, please let the chairs know before June 5th
>     so we can request a session before the deadline. Otherwise the group
>     wouldn't meet in Philadelphia.
>
>     --
>     SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OPSEC mailing list
>     OPSEC@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>


-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry