Re: [OPSEC] Request for opinions on accepting draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02 as a working group document
bill fumerola <billf@mu.org> Fri, 02 January 2009 19:27 UTC
Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52653A68DA; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:27:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D773A6A11 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:25:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.681, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9n0lhLdwC6+A for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:25:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8F23A69A4 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:25:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1098) id 817D21A3C39; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:24:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 11:24:50 -0800
From: bill fumerola <billf@mu.org>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <20090102192450.GR71246@elvis.mu.org>
References: <495D0D77.3000204@bogus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <495D0D77.3000204@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.4-MUORG-20081227 amd64
X-PGP-DEAD-Key: 1024D/7F868268
X-PGP-DEAD-Fingerprint: 5B2D 908E 4C2B F253 DAEB FC01 8436 B70B 7F86 8268
X-PGP-Key: 1024D/AE9EB579
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 2E51 E3DE 2C52 C84D 750F 8ADE 1F18 67FB AE9E B579
OpenPGP: id=AE9EB579
Cc: opsec wg mailing list <opsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Request for opinions on accepting draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02 as a working group document
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 10:37:43AM -0800, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > Working from the the action items it's time to test consensus on accepting; > > draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02 > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf-02 > > as a working group document. > accept, willing to review. -- bill _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
- [OPSEC] Request for opinions on accepting draft-k… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [OPSEC] Request for opinions on accepting dra… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [OPSEC] Request for opinions on acceptingdraf… Smith, Donald
- Re: [OPSEC] Request for opinions on accepting dra… bill fumerola