Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com> Sun, 07 May 2017 10:42 UTC
Return-Path: <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56F712422F; Sun, 7 May 2017 03:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cQDeTdJXaLqh; Sun, 7 May 2017 03:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB7B126C89; Sun, 7 May 2017 03:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.78.12] ([213.16.86.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id v47AgPCc016264 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 7 May 2017 03:42:27 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EC712B88-92BC-4581-A523-AEDD08ACEE32"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFQ9LJL0qMXG2cPPUC+jSrzbTJ_hgUupGO28Fjcr8_5f4n4iQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 03:42:25 -0700
Cc: "draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
Message-Id: <D7B0F15A-1250-45DD-885E-3B8332315ABD@doubleshotsecurity.com>
References: <55cb757e-ee2d-4818-9fc2-67d559006f34@me.com> <F6F72419-5A48-41FF-9308-A9980778E4CA@nokia.com> <1C33CFA5-06F2-4706-873B-4F0E8A9108A5@doubleshotsecurity.com> <CAFQ9LJL0qMXG2cPPUC+jSrzbTJ_hgUupGO28Fjcr8_5f4n4iQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVarvSXRUeoOz4vDr+PH/FakSozrIvJhEuEvM+V4nkxrZw4JVj16CwEKGCXFeWCElI48ushHsfSv28etGCBnODqf
X-Sonic-ID: C;yD362xEz5xG2WizL7bdh1w== M;6vsn3REz5xG2WizL7bdh1w==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/ezSF_SRlkIyztsUJXCwRXGW2Exw>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 10:42:34 -0000
At this time I want to encourage a thorough review and list any comments. With all the comments received so far I want to consolidate them all and address all the points with co-authors, then bring to list to ensure that there’s wg concensus on what changes are necessary. So a fresh review soon would be welcome. - merike > On May 6, 2017, at 6:48 AM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote: > > Folks, > > I did a thorough review of at least half of the document a while a go. If you need further reviews, I volunteer for that. > > Since I haven't looked at the I-F for a while, it would count as a "fresh review", I guess. > > Thanks! > Cheers, > Fernando > > > > > > El 6/5/2017 03:56, "Merike Kaeo" <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com <mailto:merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>> escribió: > Just as Ack re capturing all the comments and discusisons and working with other co-authors to resolve. > > If anyone is at RIPE meeting and would like to discuss, let me know. > > - merike > >> On May 4, 2017, at 11:39 PM, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com <mailto:gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Authors from draft-ietf-opsec-v6 and OPSEC WG, >> >> There has been significant discussion during WGLC for this document and during the process indications that group consensus is on some topics is not reached yet. >> Last message from Merike indicates that draft authors will work on capturing all comments and resolve them with ‘group consensus’. >> >> I’ll be waiting for an updated document and check with authors and WG when time is ready for a fresh WGLC. >> >> G/ >> >> From: OPSEC <opsec-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:opsec-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Gunter Van De Velde <guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com <mailto:guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com>> >> Date: Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 09:39 >> To: "opsec@ietf.org <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>" <opsec@ietf.org <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>> >> Subject: [ALU] [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 >> >> This is to open a two week WGLC for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6>. >> If you have not read it, please do so now. You may send nits to the author, but substantive discussion should go to the list. >> >> >> I will close the call on 26 April 2017 >> >> >> G/ >> Sent from iCloud >> _______________________________________________ >> OPSEC mailing list >> OPSEC@ietf.org <mailto:OPSEC@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec> > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > OPSEC@ietf.org <mailto:OPSEC@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec> >
- [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Gunter Van De Velde
- Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Ron Bonica
- Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Ron Bonica
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for draft-ietf-opse… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [OPSEC] FW: [ALU] Re: [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for d… Erik Kline
- [OPSEC] FW: [ALU] Re: [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for draft… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [OPSEC] Fwd: Re: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opse… Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 otroan
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for draft-ietf-opse… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 otroan
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 otroan
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 otroan
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] Re: [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for draft… Merike Kaeo
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] Re: [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for draft… Merike Kaeo
- [OPSEC] ULAs [was WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] ULAs [was WGLC for draft-ietf… Ted Lemon
- Re: [OPSEC] ULAs [was WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v… james woodyatt
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] ULAs [was WGLC for draft-ietf… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 神明達哉
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] ULAs [was WGLC for draft-ietf… Ted Lemon
- Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Merike Kaeo
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Merike Kaeo
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Tobias Fiebig
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Merike Kaeo
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Merike Kaeo