Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6

Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com> Sun, 07 May 2017 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56F712422F; Sun, 7 May 2017 03:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cQDeTdJXaLqh; Sun, 7 May 2017 03:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB7B126C89; Sun, 7 May 2017 03:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.78.12] ([213.16.86.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id v47AgPCc016264 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 7 May 2017 03:42:27 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EC712B88-92BC-4581-A523-AEDD08ACEE32"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFQ9LJL0qMXG2cPPUC+jSrzbTJ_hgUupGO28Fjcr8_5f4n4iQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 03:42:25 -0700
Cc: "draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
Message-Id: <D7B0F15A-1250-45DD-885E-3B8332315ABD@doubleshotsecurity.com>
References: <55cb757e-ee2d-4818-9fc2-67d559006f34@me.com> <F6F72419-5A48-41FF-9308-A9980778E4CA@nokia.com> <1C33CFA5-06F2-4706-873B-4F0E8A9108A5@doubleshotsecurity.com> <CAFQ9LJL0qMXG2cPPUC+jSrzbTJ_hgUupGO28Fjcr8_5f4n4iQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVarvSXRUeoOz4vDr+PH/FakSozrIvJhEuEvM+V4nkxrZw4JVj16CwEKGCXFeWCElI48ushHsfSv28etGCBnODqf
X-Sonic-ID: C;yD362xEz5xG2WizL7bdh1w== M;6vsn3REz5xG2WizL7bdh1w==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/ezSF_SRlkIyztsUJXCwRXGW2Exw>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 10:42:34 -0000

At this time I want to encourage a thorough review and list any comments.  With all the comments received so far I want to consolidate them all and address all the points with co-authors, then bring to list to ensure that there’s wg concensus on what changes are necessary.

So a fresh review soon would be welcome.

- merike

> On May 6, 2017, at 6:48 AM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I did a thorough review of at least half of the document a while a go. If you need further reviews, I volunteer for that.
> 
> Since I haven't looked at the I-F for a while, it would count as a "fresh review", I guess.
> 
> Thanks!
> Cheers,
> Fernando
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> El 6/5/2017 03:56, "Merike Kaeo" <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com <mailto:merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>> escribió:
> Just as Ack re capturing all the comments and discusisons and working with other co-authors to resolve.
> 
> If anyone is at RIPE meeting and would like to discuss, let me know.
> 
> - merike
> 
>> On May 4, 2017, at 11:39 PM, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com <mailto:gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Authors from draft-ietf-opsec-v6 and OPSEC WG,
>> 
>> There has been significant discussion during WGLC for this document and during the process indications that group consensus is on some topics is not reached yet.
>> Last message from Merike indicates that draft authors will work on capturing all comments and resolve them with ‘group consensus’.
>> 
>> I’ll be waiting for an updated document and check with authors and WG when time is ready for a fresh WGLC.
>> 
>> G/
>> 
>> From: OPSEC <opsec-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:opsec-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Gunter Van De Velde <guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com <mailto:guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com>>
>> Date: Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 09:39
>> To: "opsec@ietf.org <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>" <opsec@ietf.org <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>>
>> Subject: [ALU] [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
>> 
>> This is to open a two week WGLC for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6>.
>> If you have not read it, please do so now. You may send nits to the author, but substantive discussion should go to the list.
>> 
>> 
>> I will close the call on 26 April 2017
>> 
>> 
>> G/
>> Sent from iCloud
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSEC mailing list
>> OPSEC@ietf.org <mailto:OPSEC@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org <mailto:OPSEC@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>
>