[OPSEC] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 05 April 2021 18:13 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org, opsec-chairs@ietf.org, opsec@ietf.org, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, hayabusagsm@gmail.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <161764639244.16129.8383571157085804937@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 11:13:12 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/hwNOapJTfjM2KQAxdsBqLhIkC7w>
Subject: [OPSEC] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I haven't gone through the dozens of references to verify the claims about
them, so I'm trusting the WG and ADs here...

In Sec 2.3.2.4, RA-Guard and SAVI are recommended, but then in the same
paragraph it says that "only trivial cases" should enable it by default. I
can't reconcile these two statements.

[OPSEC] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Martin Duke via Datatracker
Re: [OPSEC] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-i… Enno Rey