Re: [OPSEC] New Version Notification for draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Fri, 05 February 2021 06:20 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBA03A1C7D for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:20:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Wahs1210o07 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:20:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28E113A1C80 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:2b9:c27:63c5:1ca8:eb3c] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:2b9:c27:63c5:1ca8:eb3c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8180F283CCD; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 06:20:03 +0000 (UTC)
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, Kirsty P <Kirsty.p=40ncsc.gov.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Cc: Ollie Whitehouse <ollie.whitehouse@nccgroup.com>
References: <161055984315.25920.7578284983388559797@ietfa.amsl.com> <LO2P123MB35999C613671D92627878AD9D7BC0@LO2P123MB3599.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <BL0PR05MB53166A910D861850352243B6AEB49@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <8d9aa788-4295-514d-a054-a323fbc3c62c@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 03:18:50 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR05MB53166A910D861850352243B6AEB49@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/ipgvyIdylv2R1NGdPF7ERv6TxiU>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] New Version Notification for draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 06:20:14 -0000

Hi, Ron,

I can volunteer for reviewing this draft if that'd be of help.

Thanks!

Regards,
Fernando




On 3/2/21 14:03, Ron Bonica wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> This appears to be a well-written draft that reflects current practice.
> 
> Could I ask for two volunteers to read and comment on the draft?
> 
>                                                             Ron
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> 
> *From:* OPSEC <opsec-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Kirsty P
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 26, 2021 6:19 AM
> *To:* opsec@ietf.org
> *Cc:* Ollie Whitehouse <ollie.whitehouse@nccgroup.com>
> *Subject:* [OPSEC] Fw: New Version Notification for 
> draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
> 
> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
> 
> Hi OPSEC,
> 
> Please see below for details of our new draft on Indicators of 
> Compromise (IoCs), updated based on previous comments. We think it might 
> be suitable for OPSEC, but we'd like to hear your comments, discussion 
> or feedback on this draft - please get in touch!
> 
> Kirsty & Ollie
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:*internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> 
> <internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
> *Sent:* 13 January 2021 17:44
> *To:* Kirsty P <Kirsty.p@ncsc.gov.uk <mailto:Kirsty.p@ncsc.gov.uk>>; 
> Kirsty P <Kirsty.p@ncsc.gov.uk <mailto:Kirsty.p@ncsc.gov.uk>>; Ollie 
> Whitehouse <ollie.whitehouse@nccgroup.com 
> <mailto:ollie.whitehouse@nccgroup.com>>
> *Subject:* New Version Notification for 
> draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Kirsty Paine and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:           draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise
> Revision:       02
> Title:          Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) and Their Role in Attack 
> Defence
> Document date:  2021-01-13
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          18
> URL: 
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
> Status: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise/
> Htmlized: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise
> Htmlized: 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02
> Diff: 
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02
> 
> Abstract:
>     Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) are an important technique in attack
>     defence (often called cyber defence).  This document outlines the
>     different types of IoC, their associated benefits and limitations,
>     and discusses their effective use.  It also contextualises the role
>     of IoCs in defending against attacks through describing a recent case
>     study.  This draft does not pre-suppose where IoCs can be found or
>     should be detected - as they can be discovered and deployed in
>     networks, endpoints or elsewhere - rather, engineers should be aware
>     that they need to be detectable (either by endpoints, security
>     appliances or network-based defences, or ideally all) to be
>     effective.  The purpose of this draft is to document both the
>     operational issues, but also the best practices associated with use
>     of IoCs today.  This draft provides a foundation for proposals for
>     new approaches to operational challenges in network security.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 
> (FOIA) and may be exempt under other UK information legislation. Refer 
> any FOIA queries to ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk 
> <mailto:ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk>. All material is UK Crown Copyright ©
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> 


-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492