Re: [OPSEC] New Version Notification for draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Fri, 05 February 2021 06:20 UTC
Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBA03A1C7D for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:20:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Wahs1210o07 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:20:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28E113A1C80 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:2b9:c27:63c5:1ca8:eb3c] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:2b9:c27:63c5:1ca8:eb3c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8180F283CCD; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 06:20:03 +0000 (UTC)
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, Kirsty P <Kirsty.p=40ncsc.gov.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Cc: Ollie Whitehouse <ollie.whitehouse@nccgroup.com>
References: <161055984315.25920.7578284983388559797@ietfa.amsl.com> <LO2P123MB35999C613671D92627878AD9D7BC0@LO2P123MB3599.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <BL0PR05MB53166A910D861850352243B6AEB49@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <8d9aa788-4295-514d-a054-a323fbc3c62c@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 03:18:50 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR05MB53166A910D861850352243B6AEB49@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/ipgvyIdylv2R1NGdPF7ERv6TxiU>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] New Version Notification for draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 06:20:14 -0000
Hi, Ron, I can volunteer for reviewing this draft if that'd be of help. Thanks! Regards, Fernando On 3/2/21 14:03, Ron Bonica wrote: > Folks, > > This appears to be a well-written draft that reflects current practice. > > Could I ask for two volunteers to read and comment on the draft? > > Ron > > Juniper Business Use Only > > *From:* OPSEC <opsec-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Kirsty P > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 26, 2021 6:19 AM > *To:* opsec@ietf.org > *Cc:* Ollie Whitehouse <ollie.whitehouse@nccgroup.com> > *Subject:* [OPSEC] Fw: New Version Notification for > draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt > > *[External Email. Be cautious of content]* > > Hi OPSEC, > > Please see below for details of our new draft on Indicators of > Compromise (IoCs), updated based on previous comments. We think it might > be suitable for OPSEC, but we'd like to hear your comments, discussion > or feedback on this draft - please get in touch! > > Kirsty & Ollie > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> > <internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> > *Sent:* 13 January 2021 17:44 > *To:* Kirsty P <Kirsty.p@ncsc.gov.uk <mailto:Kirsty.p@ncsc.gov.uk>>; > Kirsty P <Kirsty.p@ncsc.gov.uk <mailto:Kirsty.p@ncsc.gov.uk>>; Ollie > Whitehouse <ollie.whitehouse@nccgroup.com > <mailto:ollie.whitehouse@nccgroup.com>> > *Subject:* New Version Notification for > draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt > > > A new version of I-D, draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt > has been successfully submitted by Kirsty Paine and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise > Revision: 02 > Title: Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) and Their Role in Attack > Defence > Document date: 2021-01-13 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 18 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise/ > Htmlized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise > Htmlized: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02 > Diff: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02 > > Abstract: > Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) are an important technique in attack > defence (often called cyber defence). This document outlines the > different types of IoC, their associated benefits and limitations, > and discusses their effective use. It also contextualises the role > of IoCs in defending against attacks through describing a recent case > study. This draft does not pre-suppose where IoCs can be found or > should be detected - as they can be discovered and deployed in > networks, endpoints or elsewhere - rather, engineers should be aware > that they need to be detectable (either by endpoints, security > appliances or network-based defences, or ideally all) to be > effective. The purpose of this draft is to document both the > operational issues, but also the best practices associated with use > of IoCs today. This draft provides a foundation for proposals for > new approaches to operational challenges in network security. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > > This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 > (FOIA) and may be exempt under other UK information legislation. Refer > any FOIA queries to ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk > <mailto:ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk>. All material is UK Crown Copyright © > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > OPSEC@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec > -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- [OPSEC] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-pa… Kirsty P
- Re: [OPSEC] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Ron Bonica
- Re: [OPSEC] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
- Re: [OPSEC] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Ron Bonica
- Re: [OPSEC] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] New Version Notification for draft-pa… Ron Bonica