Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-22.txt

Hi, Eric,

A few days ago this doc came to mind, and I was wondering it had been 
abandoned. So thanks for rev'ing and pushing ti forward!

Regards,
Fernando

On 8/2/21 16:01, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
> This new revision (long due...) addresses the comments received from the OPS directorate (Tim Chown and Don Smith) + Mohamed Boucadair.
> 
> The authors still need to address the IETF Last Call comments from the following directorates: IoT (Ted Lemon), Routing (Acee Lindem), Security (Linda Dunbar), and GEN (Erik Kline).
> 
> Stay tuned but do not hold your breath __
> 
> -éric
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OPSEC <opsec-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Reply-To: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
> Date: Monday, 8 February 2021 at 19:56
> To: "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
> Subject: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-22.txt
> 
> 
>      A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>      This draft is a work item of the Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure WG of the IETF.
> 
>              Title           : Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks
>              Authors         : Eric Vyncke
>                                Kiran Kumar
>                                Merike Kaeo
>                                Enno Rey
>      	Filename        : draft-ietf-opsec-v6-22.txt
>      	Pages           : 55
>      	Date            : 2021-02-08
> 
>      Abstract:
>         Knowledge and experience on how to operate IPv4 securely is
>         available: whether it is the Internet or an enterprise internal
>         network.  However, IPv6 presents some new security challenges.  RFC
>         4942 describes the security issues in the protocol, but network
>         managers also need a more practical, operations-minded document to
>         enumerate advantages and/or disadvantages of certain choices.
> 
>         This document analyzes the operational security issues in several
>         types of network (enterprises, service providers and residential
>         users) and proposes technical and procedural mitigation techniques.
>         The residential users case assumes a managed ISP CPE device.  Some
>         very specific places of a network such as the Internet of Things and
>         unmanaged home networks are not discussed in this document.
> 
> 
>      The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/
> 
>      There are also htmlized versions available at:
>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-22
>      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-22
> 
>      A diff from the previous version is available at:
>      https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-22
> 
> 
>      Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>      until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
>      Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>      ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 
>      _______________________________________________
>      OPSEC mailing list
>      OPSEC@ietf.org
>      https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> 

-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492