IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Wed, 11 February 2015 02:46 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF8E1A1DBC; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:46:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HIidw8NPx3ir; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:46:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D4871A6EFB; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:46:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mb-aye.local (c-98-248-47-249.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.248.47.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1B2kGRu022890 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 02:46:17 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <54DAC271.7030604@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:46:09 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/34.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
References: <20150207194616.20651.30892.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D5B607FA-9B47-4F1B-A0C1-FB0C94A97CDB@bogus.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1502071930100.25761@shell4.bayarea.net> <06B01D8E-981D-4D06-B6CC-3B5CE92782C5@nominum.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1502080813060.2950@shell4.bayarea.net> <D97E8BB3-0DB3-4B41-8C91-DBB3121DCEF7@nominum.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1502081507150.24776@shell4.bayarea.net> <72C73500-E6C4-4D75-9CFA-8FE4B012AB9E@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <72C73500-E6C4-4D75-9CFA-8FE4B012AB9E@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="D23t5wwpagJg9XDqlgx1LBXlGhiOhOtJe"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/kcwS5yvPM5G4SUj5uQS47DQzSL4>
Cc: "draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield@ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.ad@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.shepherd@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "opsec-chairs@ietf.org" <opsec-chairs@ietf.org>, "brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 02:46:31 -0000

On 2/8/15 5:30 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2015, at 6:21 PM, C. M. Heard <heard@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Would your objections be addressed if Section 3 of the draft were 
>> replaced by something along the lines of the following?
> 
> No.   This is not a draft about filtering extension headers.  It is a draft about filtering DHCP.   The two are unrelated, and should not be discussed as if they were related.
> 
This is the peril of getting a little far afield. I think we can solve
the dhcpv6 problem discussion with a more narrowly scoped attack on the
text.

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email