[OPSEC][Technical Errata Reported] RFC7707 (8119)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 24 September 2024 22:33 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6028C169428; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id 3780B3B874; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
To: fgont@si6networks.com, tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk, warren@kumari.net, mjethanandani@gmail.com, furry13@gmail.com, rbonica@juniper.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240924223323.3780B3B874@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:33:23 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: RXFZTMDUZPBR6PGDR5TNFTUX52BKIJHV
X-Message-ID-Hash: RXFZTMDUZPBR6PGDR5TNFTUX52BKIJHV
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-opsec.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: adurmanov@gmail.com, opsec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [OPSEC][Technical Errata Reported] RFC7707 (8119)
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/m-nVEHgfhVvqVPLgt3K4VMeUsYg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:opsec-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:opsec-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:opsec-leave@ietf.org>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7707, "Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8119 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Anvar Durmanov <adurmanov@gmail.com> Section: 4.1.1.1 Original Text ------------- 1. The "Universal" bit (bit 6, from left to right) of the address is set to 1. Corrected Text -------------- 1. The "Universal" bit (bit 7, from left to right) of the address is set to 1. Notes ----- The "Universal" bit is the bit #7 and not the bit #6. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7707 (draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-08) -------------------------------------- Title : Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks Publication Date : March 2016 Author(s) : F. Gont, T. Chown Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OPSEC][Technical Errata Reported] RFC7707 (8119) RFC Errata System
- [OPSEC]Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7707 (8… Bob Hinden
- [OPSEC]Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7707 (8… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)