Re: [OPSEC] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-03: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Thu, 22 August 2019 03:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F89012003F; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yrqz4UwppFqj; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7A3812006A; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x7M3LLB4003525; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:21:21 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu x7M3LLB4003525
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1566444081; bh=+i2XUkfnbzAismpC5CZJG5+yjjgOLNiTi73QY1h1Er4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gRuAsRj6Clx64pvm6xVOBZAxj4ku3Knsa5rq4g50WiOJ8UVDfgAjjvCfCXrMw5QiX 90hpq0XNJEnaNBC1+/tMQWopukVOZ7aSdNODUCRTtvuLC4McGUic8sWnpuvaUCVL5U PEMBskI4MwJSHjSWbQChb0e6OKq4ZF3UeXt5m1cU=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x7M3LJ5k010162; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:21:19 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:21:19 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org>, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>, "opsec-chairs@ietf.org" <opsec-chairs@ietf.org>, "Sandra Murphy" <sandy@tislabs.com>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-03: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVV4tVVcueKpHF2EiLN/NtHRFUQKcGgkKA////xDA=
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:21:17 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3439C2C@marathon>
References: <156632839487.394.4368131465284019480.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DM6PR09MB301932E8BC151DAB494CA27184AA0@DM6PR09MB3019.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR09MB301932E8BC151DAB494CA27184AA0@DM6PR09MB3019.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/ndIxFY62OmVpIyLIPtrK7pJMeK8>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:21:24 -0000

Hi Sriram!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) [mailto:kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 7:21 PM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>rg>; Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org; Sandra Murphy
> <sandy@tislabs.com>om>; opsec-chairs@ietf.org; Sandra Murphy
> <sandy@tislabs.com>om>; opsec@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-
> improvements-03: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Hi Roman,
> 
> Thank you for your comments.
> My responses marked with "[KS:]" below.
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 3:13 PM
> ...
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (1) I support Alvaro Retana's DISCUSS point about the needed clarity on
> algorithm selection (A vs. B) and the security assumptions being made about
> Algorithm A.
> 
> [KS:] Yes. I am updating the draft per Alvaro's
> recommendations/suggestions.
> 
> (2) Editorial
> 
> -- Document header: s/Updates: RFC3704/Updates: 3704/
> 
> [KS:] Yes. Done.
> 
> -- Section 2.1.  Editorial.  s/are maintained which list/are maintained to list/
> 
> [KS:] Done.

Thanks for these updates.  

Roman