[OPSEC]Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7707 (8119)

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 24 September 2024 23:45 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34321C1840DE for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 16:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zy_woxkwpqjZ for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 16:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B1ABC15793B for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 16:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3e163e2a9fdso3463928b6e.2 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 16:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1727221499; x=1727826299; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yMPmR4VkwqDREcQSj+7wXuQCRvwilPgtULAFEjlRvXc=; b=DnsUKi2ExNDM5I2kDkj9qzTH1vZtl9PZCjEsZH0qnHrt7h5qX1GQdU2U2yQwrBoCsj nawJyIhxTgJBRoHZUcVNT75hjIH9e3IOefEVrtsnCsgf0D5rkwmN43/ydtiKkQavUExl VNFjj7w2Z0Yx92FalmNRIkFoAKtiTVB5SkS5P/wfkOZSQUx6Tem4ZNKiQaj6XVbe0xI4 SikY/E0TTKL4L0wVJ5Svnb22aagmfiNwY6RXQ7Ledw7ifVAMdMzFvDGiXUqhAi+32+f9 sVkQlINcR5o77gH8u3W6LSGLdmu+duy7G1x4BxMNj+U2IuOba/YS1eAx8SO+P9gXidbK 7wpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727221499; x=1727826299; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=yMPmR4VkwqDREcQSj+7wXuQCRvwilPgtULAFEjlRvXc=; b=KOVQOqkuXlejH8g03U1qXAoJWJwXH5wcOF7sTrlF1208N7OZGV81nGfdzlk6grGY1W 2Y/q9520FwSH10hamCQZ8vP5zJ0D0QmCCN7KjWBi3TSpRX1LDWhHJuh9Y2uF+fpR38jq JbCZFtjJvrBvp+hANJJNE7WIO2+cuvn6gyyB8Atz/HhqWroH9CbR5LAr5Xu90Eiqvagr l1sBNZWTQgZRIR65dbt5FX+e9o2feVIzcKw5FrObOQhtQDmVOO94yjNGxWJ4hwofA5CA JX5EeR0EMFtGjRomrvJRiHQsW5/Qk14BhFPf4zDmi1clG+uZ9y+yM4N/5Dt0EzYvi0tR x+Rg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWeJbUg/c3WtnhcagCiv2KxC9HvibsMgFPqGjRPBD7fbXiXn4VJdOq8DPZZMUZGV204vNbllg==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy8Z/WTqAzxRYF9vG7eqZoTFe9zzwfoRR6wzD4Aalq+3rHWIhuc OS4qSZ/FWKaHrVBR3GNFDsOUyWvUKVAPL/82j2H0Z9slb478tC4Z
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFvj70MwhR1KKlxTpvfMlBNf45JHWxFmrzKTnyR8RGHHtRYIdXQJ8btgPUv5Sh8PVKu4Z4pFQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:211d:b0:3e0:43ca:bfd4 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3e29b7f3036mr663704b6e.44.1727221499377; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 16:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:1700:4383:c05f:d813:3b38:63a2:c38]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5614622812f47-3e2938f8b6bsm752569b6e.11.2024.09.24.16.44.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Sep 2024 16:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EBF8FD06-4E87-4C4E-AC1F-8AA0AFB5D36E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.1\))
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240924223323.3780B3B874@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 16:44:34 -0700
Message-Id: <EC59022F-24D7-42A1-961F-56E0CF35E1B5@gmail.com>
References: <20240924223323.3780B3B874@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.1)
Message-ID-Hash: 4X6V425ZKDEJYYRUPZ72UD276GDNJH2O
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4X6V425ZKDEJYYRUPZ72UD276GDNJH2O
X-MailFrom: bob.hinden@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-opsec.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, mjethanandani@gmail.com, adurmanov@gmail.com, opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [OPSEC]Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7707 (8119)
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/t9oIT_BNeaKPL2ApbTxargIxJeQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:opsec-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:opsec-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:opsec-leave@ietf.org>

Hi,

I don’t think this errata is correct.   Looking at RFC4291 "Appendix A: Creating Modified EUI-64 Format Interface Identifiers” the bits in IEEE EUI-64 Identifiers are numbered starting from 00.  

   The only change needed to transform an IEEE EUI-64 identifier to an
   interface identifier is to invert the "u" (universal/local) bit.  An
   example is a globally unique IEEE EUI-64 identifier of the form:

   |0              1|1              3|3              4|4              6|
   |0              5|6              1|2              7|8              3|
   +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
   |cccccc0gcccccccc|ccccccccmmmmmmmm|mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm|mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm|
   +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+

The original text is correct.

Bob


> On Sep 24, 2024, at 3:33 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7707,
> "Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8119
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Anvar Durmanov <adurmanov@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 4.1.1.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> 1.  The "Universal" bit (bit 6, from left to right) of the address is set to 1.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 1.  The "Universal" bit (bit 7, from left to right) of the address is set to 1.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The "Universal" bit is the bit #7 and not the bit #6.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7707 (draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-08)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks
> Publication Date    : March 2016
> Author(s)           : F. Gont, T. Chown
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list -- opsec@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to opsec-leave@ietf.org