Re: new C-S draft

Alex Bochannek <abochann@cisco.com> Wed, 12 April 1995 04:25 UTC

Message-Id: <199504120330.UAA03986@hubbub.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 1995 20:30:55 -0700
Reply-To: oswg-l@wugate.wustl.edu
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Alex Bochannek <abochann@cisco.com>
To: oswg-l@wugate.wustl.edu
Subject: Re: new C-S draft
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Apr 95 09:39:06 EDT." <9504111339.aa10762@nic.near.net>

> > The authentication type names specified in RFC1409 could be used here.
> 
> This doesn't seem like it's buying us anything.  I guess the basic 
> question here is do we need a "standard" list of authentication types
> specified in this document?  Not every server or client need support
> all of the types...

...but needs to at least support one type with a specified name. I'd
suggest we specify something like NULL and PASSWORD to be mandatory
and everything else implementation specific.

--
Alex Bochannek                                Phone : +1 408 526 51 91
Network Analyst - ECS                         Fax   : +1 408 526 45 75
Cisco Systems, Inc.                           Pager : +1 408 485 90 92
170 West Tasman Drive, Bldg E                 Email : abochannek@cisco.com
San Jose, CA 95134-1706, USA

new C-S draft Henry Clark
Re: new C-S draft Alex Bochannek
Re: new C-S draft Henry Clark
Re: new C-S draft Alex Bochannek
Re: new C-S draft Henry Clark