Re: California wimps need not apply
Fred Baker <email@example.com> Thu, 15 December 1994 23:55 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09977;
15 Dec 94 18:55 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09973; 15 Dec 94 18:55 EST
Received: from merit.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20398; 15 Dec 94 18:55 EST
Received: from nacho.cisco.com (nacho.cisco.com [184.108.40.206]) by merit.edu (8.6.9/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id SAA22472 for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 1994 18:37:32 -0500
Received: from [220.127.116.11] (fbaker-mac.cisco.com [18.104.22.168]) by nacho.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/CISCO.SERVER.1.1) with SMTP id PAA24054; Thu, 15 Dec 1994 15:35:17 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1994 15:35:20 -0800
To: Brian Lloyd <email@example.com>
From: Fred Baker <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: California wimps need not apply
Cc: Tom Coradetti <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
At 12:46 PM 12/15/94, Brian Lloyd wrote: >Warning to the humor impaired: this reply message is sent in jest, i.e. is >*not*, I repeat, *not* serious. It contains no information of any >substance. Therefore, it clearly ... qualifies to be on the IETF >standards track. Is *that* the criterion? I have been trying to figure out the criterion for some time now... >It's cold here in California too. I had to wear a sweater yesterday! I've been spending far too much time in San Jose. I was going to bring my winter jacket, but my wife told me I needed something with long sleeves. So I brought a poncho. ============================================================================= If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room!