IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet

Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Sat, 22 February 1992 17:24 UTC

Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10363; 22 Feb 92 12:24 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10359; 22 Feb 92 12:24 EST
Received: from glenlivet.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.14695-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Sat, 22 Feb 1992 17:05:46 +0000
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
cc: yeongw@psi.com, wpp-camayocs@nisc.psi.net
Subject: Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet
Phone: +44-71-380-7294
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 10 Feb 92 12:35:32 -0800. <23545.697754132@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 1992 17:05:41 +0000
Message-ID: <2435.698778341@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
From: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk>


 >From:  Marshall Rose <mrose@us.ca.mtview.dbc>
 >To:    S.Kille@uk.ac.ucl.cs
 >Subject: Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet
 >Date:  Mon, 10 Feb 92 12:35:32 -0800

 >Tsk.  Tsk.  Steve - NADF175 doesn't have flaws, it just doesn't fit in with
 >your model of what the DIT should be.  

I said that I believe it has flaws.   I still do.
 
 >Earlier versions of NADF175 have
 >been dissemminated for comment for over a year now.  I've yet to see a
 >show-stopper or anything that wasn't dealth with by better wording...

NADF 175 may be perfect, but I doubt it.  I have had documents on the table
which have been extensively reviewed, but are still full of holes the size
of a barn door!

 >
 >/mtr

Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email