Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet

Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr> Wed, 05 February 1992 13:11 UTC

Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08483; 5 Feb 92 8:11 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08478; 5 Feb 92 8:11 EST
Received: from mitsou.inria.fr by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.29343-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 5 Feb 1992 12:40:44 +0000
Received: from localhost by mitsou.inria.fr with SMTP (5.65c/IDA-1.2.8) id AA25574; Wed, 5 Feb 1992 13:42:13 +0100
Message-Id: <199202051242.AA25574@mitsou.inria.fr>
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet
In-Reply-To: Your message of "04 Feb 92 20:26:51 EST." <9202050126.AA00171@spartacus.psi.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1992 13:42:13 +0000
From: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>
X-Mts: smtp

>At the risk of being excessively pedantic, the point I'm trying to
>get across is that the Directory should reflect the infrastructure
>created by the appropriate existing registration authorities. ISO does
>not have the right to create civil infrastructure in France, the French
>government does.

uh? What the hell is the French government doing here! I assure you that it
has a lot of more urgent problems to deal with. Besides, value added
computer service is a deregulated authority, in which the government does
not even has the right to intervene, following EC rules.

I can use whatever keys I want for my databases, and the government has
nothing to say to it. I dont even have to feel constrained by national
boundaries. In another context, a French advisory body of the telecom
regulation authority discussed once the allocation of NSAPs; it was felt
perfectly OK that a French company will obtain an NSAP from e.g. BSI...

Christian Huitema