Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses
Colin Robbins <c.robbins@nexor.co.uk> Wed, 26 May 1993 11:44 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01725; 26 May 93 7:44 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01721; 26 May 93 7:44 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05510; 26 May 93 7:44 EDT
X400-Received: by mta haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk in /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; Relayed; Wed, 26 May 1993 10:58:43 +0100
Date: Wed, 26 May 1993 10:58:43 +0100
X400-Originator: osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; haig.cs.uc.363:26.04.93.09.58.43]
Priority: Non-Urgent
DL-Expansion-History: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk ; Wed, 26 May 1993 10:58:43 +0100;
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Colin Robbins <c.robbins@nexor.co.uk>
Message-ID: <"26411 Wed May 26 10:58:06 1993"@nexor.co.uk>
To: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
In-Reply-To: <199305260829.AA18017@mitsou.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses
>1) The LDAP debate ... I agree that distributing the high level searches is very difficult to do, but as you point out later, replication can be used to solve the problem. What is needed is this case is an agreed DIT wide replication model. An attempt has been made with the "Internet X.500 Replication model" - RFC 1276, but this has not been widely adopted. Hence the point in my previous mail about needing to allow for DSAs that cannot perform these searches. There are a number of other (perhaps more acceptable) ways the required replication can be achieved. We could adopt the proposed 1992 X.500 standard replication protocol, or possibly use something along the lines of the NADF KAN model. [ ASIDE: Does anybody know what is happening with the proposed "1992" X.500 standards? I have heard rumours that they may not be accepted as standards! ] With such replication in place, DUA implementors can start to offer users the consistent level of service required. >2) The PSAP debate showed that people are naturally reluctant to duplicate >their "machine addresses" in all their "application" entries. Indeed, that is >the first rule of data base management -- never duplicate information, less you >end up with inconsistant updates. In a relational SGBD, the "application" >tuple would have a "support system identifier" entry, and inherit the NSAP >address from this entry. The X.500 schema, from that point of view, is very >naive. Doesn't this model require that the NSAP for the "machine address" is the same as the NSAP for the "application" entries. Or do you mean by 'inherit the NSAP' that the "application" will inherit an NSAP prefix from the "machine", and append it specific address suffix? In anycase, doesn't this model tie the NSAP for an "application" to that of a "machine", I thought we were trying to get away from this situation. Colin
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses Edwards Reed
- Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses Peter Yee
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses Peter Yee
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses Thomas Johannsen
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses James W. Hong
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses Steve Kille
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses C.B.Stathopoulos
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses James W. Hong
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses C.B.Stathopoulos
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses C.B.Stathopoulos
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses Peter Furniss
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses Peter Yee
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses pays
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses Jean-Paul Le Guigner
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses Christian Huitema
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses Colin Robbins
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses Christian Huitema
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses Peter Yee
- Re: Using X.500 to determine presentationAddresses C.B.Stathopoulos