Re: root knowledge
Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Sat, 25 April 1992 19:18 UTC
Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00610; 25 Apr 92 15:18 EDT
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25765; 25 Apr 92 15:23 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25755; 25 Apr 92 15:22 EDT
Received: from glenlivet.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.09139-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Sat, 25 Apr 1992 19:29:36 +0100
To: pays@faugeres.inria.fr
cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: root knowledge
Phone: +44-71-380-7294
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 24 Apr 92 22:38:00 +0100. <704147880.3868.0@faugeres.inria.fr>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1992 19:28:14 +0100
Message-ID: <784.704226494@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
From: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
I can see arguments for other means of distributing the knowledge information, additional to the protocol described in RFC 1276. Use of a file format is one appraoch. Another might be a stub server, whihc allows a standalone process to extract the information dynamically, which can be modified to allow output in a convenient format. I don't understand why you are suggesting any new attributes and object classes. Can you explain why RFC 1276 does not suffice? Steve
- Re: root knowledge Colin Robbins
- Re: root knowledge pays
- Re: root knowledge Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: root knowledge Sylvain Langlois
- DSAs through ISDN connections Sylvain Langlois
- Re: root knowledge pays
- Re: root knowledge Colin Robbins
- Re: root knowledge pays
- Re: root knowledge Colin Robbins
- Re: root knowledge pays
- Re: root knowledge Colin Robbins
- Re: root knowledge pays
- Re: root knowledge Christian Huitema
- Re: root knowledge Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: root knowledge yeongw
- Re: root knowledge Andrew Waugh
- Re: root knowledge yeongw
- Re: root knowledge Andrew Waugh
- Re: root knowledge yeongw
- Re: root knowledge Thomas Johannsen