Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...)
Colin Robbins <c.robbins@nexor.co.uk> Wed, 17 November 1993 23:37 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16107;
17 Nov 93 18:37 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16103;
17 Nov 93 18:37 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26186;
17 Nov 93 18:37 EST
X400-Received: by mta haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk in /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/;
Relayed; Wed, 17 Nov 1993 22:48:00 +0000
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1993 22:48:00 +0000
X400-Originator: osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/;
haig.cs.uc.104:17.10.93.22.48.00]
Priority: Non-Urgent
DL-Expansion-History: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk ; Wed, 17 Nov 1993 22:48:00 +0000;
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Colin Robbins <c.robbins@nexor.co.uk>
Message-ID: <"23904 Wed Nov 17 22:47:13 1993"@nexor.co.uk>
To: pays@faugeres.inria.fr
Cc: tim@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu, steve.kille@isode.com,
Woermann@osi.e3x.fr, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
In-Reply-To: "753463764.2580.0-faugeres.inria.fr":
Subject: Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...)
I've been watching this debate from the end of a very slow piece wire whilst travelling in the US, so I may have missed something. Having said that, the as far as I can see, the probems being discussed are in reference to a set of specific tests the OFIP have performed on QUIPU. I have seen detailed test reports from the OFIP on the problems, and none of them look to be like major architecture problem, I have them all labelled in the bug catergory. I have sent the OFIP an attempted bug fix, which gets some way there, but not the whole way. When I get back, I'll look at putting the full fix in place. The bug fix does not require any major architecture change in QUIPU, so I don't forsee any major operational deployment issues for PARADISE. Have I missed something the OFIP have not reported? Has anyone given a detailed problem description yet, can you circulate the OFIP problem description? Colin
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) pays
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) Sylvain Langlois
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) Tim Howes
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) Julian Onions
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) Steve Kille
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) pays
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) Christian Huitema
- Rep (4) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) Ascan Woermann
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) Colin Robbins
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) pays
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) Skip Slone
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) pays
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) pays
- Re: Rep (2) : QUIPU vs X.500 (was: A tool for...) Colin Robbins