Re: Schema group
Mark Prior <mrp@itd.adelaide.edu.au> Mon, 02 January 1995 23:47 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05387;
2 Jan 95 18:47 EST
Received: from [132.151.1.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05383;
2 Jan 95 18:47 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19493;
2 Jan 95 18:47 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP
id <g.02902-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 2 Jan 1995 23:30:59 +0000
Received: from jarrah.itd.adelaide.edu.au by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk
with Internet SMTP id <g.29276-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>;
Mon, 2 Jan 1995 23:30:21 +0000
Received: by jarrah.itd.adelaide.edu.au with SMTP (5.61+IDA+MU+NF/UA-5.28)
id AA19996; Tue, 3 Jan 1995 09:37:36 +1030
Message-Id: <9501022307.AA19996@jarrah.itd.adelaide.edu.au>
To: Michael Gsandtner <gsa@adv.magwien.gv.at>
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Schema group
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Jan 1995 11:27:09 BST."
<199501021027.AA04656@adv.magwien.gv.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 1995 09:37:35 +1030
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Mark Prior <mrp@itd.adelaide.edu.au>
> > I think is exactly the mechanism that the people at the
> > meeting
> > _didn't_ want. It seemed to me the concensus was that
> > once an OID had been chosen for something then as long
> > as it was legal (ie it didn't have to be an IANA blessed
> > OID) then it was fixed. I am using perfectly valid
> > Standards Australia OIDs and I'm not about to change
> > them just to get some sanction from the IETF process.
>
Why are the IANA OIDs not legal ?
I was not suggesting that they aren't legal, what I was saying is that
IANA is not the only registration authority. I have, and are using,
OIDs that have been created according to the rules documented by my
country ISO authority (Standards Australia).
In austria we lack an organisation which really administrates OIDs, so we use
IANA OIDs.
- Can the IANA OIDs sometime become not globally unique ?
No, I assume IANA has properly registered themselves with whomever
controls the label above them and so they would be globally unique.
- Have I really to persuade VNORM (austrian ISO memberbody) that it have to
give us an OID ? (which will take quite a long time)
No, what I have been saying is that those of us that have an ISO
member organisation that has its act together should be free to use
those OIDs and not be forced, if we wish to promote something we have
done within the IETF, to change OIDs from our current valid OIDs to
some other valid OID just because the latter comes from IANA.
I also think that changing an OID from one IANA controlled branch to
another one just because something is moving through the IETF
standards process makes little sense either.
- Or is there any other (easier) way to get a legal OID ?
For you the easiest way to get legal OIDs is to apply to IANA.
Mark.
- Schema group Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV)
- Re: Schema group Mark Prior
- Re: Schema group Srinivas R Sataluri
- Re: Schema group Ken Rossen
- Re: Schema group Russ Wright
- Re: Schema group D.W.Chadwick
- Re: Schema group Michael Gsandtner
- Re: Schema group William C Green
- Re: Schema group Russ Wright
- Re: Schema group Mark Prior