Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question

Sylvain Langlois <Sylvain.Langlois@der.edf.fr> Wed, 02 June 1993 08:47 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00783; 2 Jun 93 4:47 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00779; 2 Jun 93 4:47 EDT
Received: from mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03765; 2 Jun 93 4:47 EDT
Received: from cs.wisc.edu by mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu with SMTP (PP) id <20287-0@mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu>; Wed, 2 Jun 1993 03:17:12 +0000
Received: from chenas.inria.fr by cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 2 Jun 93 03:16:59 -0500
Received: from edf.edf.fr by chenas.inria.fr (5.65c8d/92.02.29) via Fnet-EUnet id AA17602; Wed, 2 Jun 1993 10:15:36 +0200 (MET)
Received: from cli53an.YP.imaicitpt (cli53an.der.edf.fr) by edf.edf.fr with SMTP id AA05420 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4); Wed, 2 Jun 1993 10:16:20 +0100
Received: from cli53an by cli53an.YP.imaicitpt (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA04278; Wed, 2 Jun 93 10:16:02 +0100
To: Alf Hansen <Alf.Hansen@delab.sintef.no>
Cc: Jock Gill <jgill@nsf.gov>, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: Yet another X.400 vs SMTP question
In-Reply-To: Alf Hansen's message of 02 Jun 1993 07:30:45 +0000. <4113*Alf.Hansen@delab.sintef.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1993 10:15:59 +0100
Message-Id: <4277.739012559@cli53an.der.edf.fr>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Sylvain Langlois <Sylvain.Langlois@der.edf.fr>

> PS. I Cc-ed this message to the IETF X.400 Operations WG such that they also
> can follow up this discussion.

Thanks Alf! May I suggest that  the discussion is moved to x400ops: at
this stage, it is more a X.400 debate than a X.500 debate!
Thanks in advance...

Sylvain
----------------
Sylvain.Langlois@der.edf.fr