Re: DNS under o=Internet
Sylvain Langlois <sylvain@cli53an.edf.fr> Thu, 06 February 1992 16:08 UTC
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14807; 6 Feb 92 11:08 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14791; 6 Feb 92 11:08 EST
Via: bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk; Thu, 6 Feb 1992 12:50:08 +0000
Received: from mcsun.eu.net by eros.uknet.ac.uk via EUnet with SMTP (PP) id <7172-0@eros.uknet.ac.uk>; Thu, 6 Feb 1992 10:00:13 +0000
Received: from corton.inria.fr by mcsun.EU.net with SMTP; id AA22746 (5.65a/CWI-2.138); Thu, 6 Feb 1992 10:39:24 +0100
Received: from edfder1.UUCP by corton.inria.fr (5.65c8d/91.12.15) via Fnet-EUnet id AA12417; Thu, 6 Feb 1992 09:48:31 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: from cli53an.der.edf.fr by edfder1.edf.fr, Thu, 6 Feb 92 09:41:35 +0100
PP-warning: Illegal Received field on preceding line
Received: from loghost by cli53an.der.edf.fr (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA06371; Thu, 6 Feb 92 09:34:29 GMT
To: yeongw@psi.com
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: DNS under o=Internet
In-Reply-To: yeongw@spartacus.psi.com's message of Wed, 05 Feb 92 19:16:10 -0500. <9202060016.AA01555@spartacus.psi.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1992 09:34:29 +0000
Message-Id: <6370.697368869@cli53an>
From: Sylvain Langlois <sylvain@cli53an.edf.fr>
> Given this, as long as Directory operators agree to list the Internet, > they have to accept the Internet registration authority. In other words > I'm arguing that the IANA's (or whatever) authority to register > Internet-centric things is derived not from a delegation from ISO, > but from its recognition as the registration authority for the Internet > by the Internet community. I totally agree. The main advantage of this, is, as usual, "make the whole thing work first!". I am not sure this is the way ISO bodies see it but... > This is the same concept as the recognition of the civil naming > authorities. I don't think ISO ever delegated the U.S. Government > the right to be the registration authority for the civil infrastructure > in the U.S. (that right is derived from sovereignity) for example :-). ISO is in some places where nobody expects to find it :-) Sylvain ---------------- Sylvain Langlois "Dogmatic attachement to the supposed merits (sylvain@cli53an.edf.fr) of a particular structure hinders the searc h of an appropriate structure" (Robert Fripp)
- DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet William Manning
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Kenneth Carlberg
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Tim Howes
- Re: DNS under o=Internet valdis
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Al Grimstad
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Mark Prior
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet William Manning
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Christian Huitema
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet A.Waugh
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Sylvain Langlois
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Einar Stefferud
- Re: DNS under o=Internet A.Waugh
- Re: DNS under o=Internet George Michaelson
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet George Michaelson
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet yeongw
- Re: DNS under o=Internet Steve Hardcastle-Kille