IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments from Christian H. on LDAP

Erik Huizer <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl> Thu, 14 January 1993 13:49 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11106; 14 Jan 93 8:49 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11102; 14 Jan 93 8:49 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01560; 14 Jan 93 8:50 EST
X400-Received: by mta haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk in /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; Relayed; Thu, 14 Jan 1993 12:51:56 +0000
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1993 12:51:56 +0000
X400-Originator: osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; haig.cs.uc.215:14.00.93.12.51.56]
Priority: Non-Urgent
DL-Expansion-History: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk ; Thu, 14 Jan 1993 12:51:56 +0000;
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Erik Huizer <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl>
Message-ID: <9301141250.AA01345@survival.surfnet.nl>
To: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>
Cc: Steve Hardcastle-Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>, RARE & IETF OSI-DS wg <osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <199301140956.AA04656@mitsou.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: Comments from Christian H. on LDAP
Organisation: SURFnet bv
Address: Cluetinckborch, P.O. Box 19035, 3501 DA Utrecht, NL
Phone: +31 30 310290
Telefax: +31 30 340903

Allow me to draw some conclusions from the arguments that have passed on
this. Whether OSI is doomed or not, LDAP is usefull! 

So without wanting to cut off the discussion on whether LDSP is
necessary/wanted, I want to progress the LDAP documents. So here's my
perception of the situation on this:

Theauthors will work in Marshall's and the first 5 comments from Christian
in as far as these have not been argumented against in the past couple of
mails. Then they present a new I-D version, and we will move ahead. OK.

Erik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email