Re: Soft-Switch and X.500--Zisman Quoted

Skip Slone <jpslone@tag.den.mmc.com> Tue, 31 August 1993 18:58 UTC

Date: Tue, 31 Aug 93 12:50:01 MDT
Message-Id: <9308311850.AA02320@tag>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Skip Slone <jpslone@tag.den.mmc.com>
Reply-To: Skip Slone <jpslone@mmc.com>
To: pays@faugeres.inria.fr, dssig@nist.gov, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, osi-ds@eso2.orl.mmc.com, jpslone@mmc.com
Subject: Re: Soft-Switch and X.500--Zisman Quoted

In message <746821808.23046.0-faugeres.inria.fr*@MHS>  writes:
> > >             If we delivered X.500 today, none of our customers could use 
> > > it
> > >             because there's nothing else out there that uses X.500.
> > > 
> 
> Is that really annoying? or just indicating that SoftSwitch is unable
> to deliver X.500 today, which may delight their competitors?  :-)
> 

The thing that bothers me is the uphill battle I find myself continually 
fighting because so many people take what he says as the absolute truth.

  -- Skip

RE: Soft-Switch and X.500--Zisman Quoted Bor, Alexis
Soft-Switch and X.500--Zisman Quoted Skip Slone
Re: Soft-Switch and X.500--Zisman Quoted Skip Slone
Re: Soft-Switch and X.500--Zisman Quoted pays
Re: Soft-Switch and X.500--Zisman Quoted Loux, Greg
Re: Soft-Switch and X.500--Zisman Quoted Steve Kille
Re: Soft-Switch and X.500--Zisman Quoted jdecarlo