IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet

S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk Mon, 10 February 1992 20:40 UTC

Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18342; 10 Feb 92 15:40 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18324; 10 Feb 92 15:40 EST
Received: from pink.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.22673-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Mon, 10 Feb 1992 19:34:20 +0000
To: yeongw@psi.com
cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, wpp-camayocs@nisc.psi.net, S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: X.500, Naming and the Internet
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 Feb 92 08:57:46 EST." <9202031357.AA00340@spartacus.psi.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1992 19:34:20 +0000
From: S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Message-ID: <9202101540.aa18324@NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US>

Wengyik,

Thanks for your note.    I will be sending some more detailed comments,
an genrala analysuis when i have a little more time to read
my email backlog.   These are important issues.

I did not reply initially, as I had expected you to be advocating (from
the topic list0 some of the things advocated by NADF 175, which I believe to
have some serious fflaws.    I will comment on this later.

I'd just like to note that I think you have hit the nail on the head, and
that I agree 100% with most of your note.   I think that your choice of
terminology is a bit confuisng, and that it might be useful to change this
a little.   

Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email