CLDAP Last Call
Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com> Tue, 14 December 1993 20:43 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09457;
14 Dec 93 15:43 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09453;
14 Dec 93 15:43 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17319;
14 Dec 93 15:43 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP
id <g.05435-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 20:22:46 +0000
Received: from glengoyne.isode.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
id <g.09642-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Tue, 14 Dec 1993 20:22:11 +0000
To: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: CLDAP Last Call
Phone: +44-81-332-9091
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1993 20:21:49 +0000
Message-ID: <11985.755900509@glengoyne.isode.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
I have reviewed the discussion. There are some real issues. I propose that a revised last call date is set when a new I-D has been submitted and 2-3 weeks has been allowed for initial comment. Steve
- CLDAP Last Call Steve Kille